(Q51898251)

17 April 2018

title

Face-to-face versus remote administration of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale using videoconference and telephone. (English)

1 reference

17 April 2018

2

Janet B W Williams

0 references

author name string

Kenneth A Kobak

1

1 reference

17 April 2018

Elizabeth Jeglic

3

1 reference

17 April 2018

Donna Salvucci

4

1 reference

17 April 2018

Ian R Sharp

5

1 reference

17 April 2018

publication date

1 January 2008

1 reference

17 April 2018

published in

Depression and Anxiety

1 reference

17 April 2018

volume

25

1 reference

17 April 2018

issue

11

1 reference

17 April 2018

page(s)

913-919

1 reference

17 April 2018

Use of videophones and low-cost standard telephone lines to provide a social presence in telepsychiatry.

cites work

1 reference

Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness

21 January 2018

1 reference

Telepsychiatry at forty: what have we learned?

21 January 2018

1 reference

7 January 2021

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standard become a lead weight?

1 reference

7 January 2021

Exactly what does the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale measure?

1 reference

7 January 2021

Telepsychiatry in South Australia

1 reference

7 January 2021

Administering the MADRS by telephone or face-to-face: a validity study

1 reference

7 January 2021

Relative sensitivity of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Hamilton Depression rating scale and the Clinical Global Impressions rating scale in antidepressant clinical trials

1 reference

7 January 2021

A comparison of face-to-face and videoconference administration of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

1 reference

7 January 2021

Enriched rater training using Internet based technologies: a comparison to traditional rater training in a multi-site depression trial

1 reference

7 January 2021

Interview quality and signal detection in clinical trials

1 reference

7 January 2021

Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine

1 reference

7 January 2021

Comparison of the standard and structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in depressed geriatric inpatients

1 reference

7 January 2021

A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change

1 reference

7 January 2021

Effects of interrater reliability of psychopathologic assessment on power and sample size calculations in clinical trials

1 reference

7 January 2021

Validation of an IVRS version of the MADRS

1 reference

7 January 2021

Penny-wise and pound-foolish: the impact of measurement error on sample size requirements in clinical trials

1 reference

7 January 2021

Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design

1 reference

7 January 2021

Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression.

1 reference

7 January 2021

Telephone assessment of depression severity

1 reference

7 January 2021

Telepsychiatry: assessment of televideo psychiatric interview reliability with present- and next-generation internet infrastructures

1 reference

7 January 2021

Identifiers

DOI

10.1002/DA.20392

1 reference

17 April 2018

1 reference

17 April 2018