(Q56226471)

English

Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation

article

In more languages

default for all languages

No label defined

No description defined

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

0 references

title

Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation (English)

0 references

0 references

1 reference

J. Scott Armstrong

1

0 references

publication date

March 1997

0 references

published in

Science and Engineering Ethics

0 references

volume

3

0 references

issue

1

0 references

page(s)

63-84

0 references

cites work

Pernicious publication practices

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-997-0017-3

retrieved

21 January 2018

The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-997-0017-3

retrieved

21 January 2018

How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-997-0017-3

retrieved

21 January 2018

Brain size and cognitive ability: Correlations with age, sex, social class, and race

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-997-0017-3

retrieved

21 January 2018

The Peer Review Process Used to Evaluate Manuscripts Submitted to Academic Journals

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS11948-997-0017-3

retrieved

21 January 2018

Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again

2 references

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1017/S0140525X00011183

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Gender factors in reviewer recommendations for manuscript publication

2 references

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1901/JABA.1990.23-539

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation

2 references

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1001/JAMA.1990.03440100162024

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system

2 references

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1007/BF01173636

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Peer review and publication. Presidential address before the 70th annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, San Francisco, California, 30 April 1978

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Peer review in cyberspace

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

An Experiment in Publication: Advance Publication Review

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task.

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Barriers to scientific contributions: The author's formula

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Towards a reduction in publication bias

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

What do peer reviewers do?

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The earth is round (p < .05).

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The Ombudsman: Management Folklore and Management Science—On Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias, and Such

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The task of a statistical referee

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

IQ and Heredity: Suspicion of Fraud Beclouds Classic Experiment

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Variation in journal peer review systems. Possible causes and consequences

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in three public health journals

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature. The Stephen E. Breuning case

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Replications and extensions in marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Minimizing the three stages of publication bias

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

The integrity of the scientific literature

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Underreporting research is scientific misconduct

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review?

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/references/10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

Identifiers

DOI

10.1007/S11948-997-0017-3

0 references

ResearchGate publication ID

23745027

0 references

(Q56226471)

Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)