(Q58229298)

1

0 references

M.Y. O'Brien

2

0 references

J.A. Christie

3

0 references

S.A. Ferguson

5

0 references

C.S. Hamilton

6

0 references

J.W. Denham

Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer

7

0 references

publication date

October 1996

0 references

published in

The Breast

0 references

volume

5

0 references

page(s)

358-367

0 references

issue

5

0 references

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Limited usefulness of observer-based cosmesis scales employed to evaluate patients treated conservatively for breast cancer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Breast retraction assessment. Multiple variable analysis of factors responsible for cosmetic retraction in patients treated conservatively for stage I or II breast carcinoma

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings, and objective assessments

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 1. Proposal of a quantitative scoring system

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 2. A quantitative analysis of the influence of radiation dose, fractionation schedules and surgical treatment techniques on cosmetic results

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Conservative breast cancer treatment: analysis of cosmetic results and the role of concomitant adjuvant chemotherapy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Boost dosage to the excision site following conservative surgery for breast cancer: it's easy to miss!

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Early breast cancer: cosmetic and functional results after treatment by conservative techniques

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Breast appearance and function after breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Patient self-evaluation of cosmetic outcome of breast-preserving cancer treatment

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Early and Late Normal-tissue Injury after Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Alone or Combined with Chemotherapy

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021

Repair capacity and kinetics of human skin during fractionated radiotherapy: erythema, desquamation, and telangiectasia after 3 and 5 year's follow-up

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0960-9776%2896%2990004-1

7 January 2021