(Q59607481)

English

Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist

scholarly article published 12 December 2017

In more languages

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

0 references

title

Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist (English)

0 references

Michael Hendricks

2

0 references

Holly O. Witteman

object named as

Holly O Witteman

series ordinal

1

0 references

Cara Tannenbaum

series ordinal

4

object named as

Cara Tannenbaum

0 references

author name string

Sharon Straus

series ordinal

3

0 references

publication date

12 December 2017

0 references

cites work

Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping Review

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0169718

Journals invite too few women to referee

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1038/541455A

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.

1 reference

27 May 2022

https://opencitations.net/index/coci/api/v1/citations/10.1016/J.TREE.2007.07.008

Identifiers

DOI

10.1101/232868

0 references

(Q59607481)

Female grant applicants are equally successful when peer reviewers assess the science, but not when they assess the scientist

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)