(Q80516339)

English

Rate control is more cost-effective than rhythm control for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation--results from the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study

scientific article published on 01 September 2004

Statements

Rate control is more cost-effective than rhythm control for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation--results from the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study (English)

Identifiers

 
edit
    edit
      edit
        edit
          edit
            edit
              edit
                edit
                  edit