Talk:Q20748091
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Innocent bystander in topic How to use these badges for Wikisource?
Autodescription — not proofread (Q20748091)
description: badge being used as a Wikisource work status indicator
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “not proofread” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for awards
This section is generated using {{TP award}}. It is designed for all items of class award (Q618779).
- Count of award winners (query) – List of award winners (query)
- Count by instance of (P31) (query)
- List of award winners by date (query)
- Queries for distinctions awarded to humans
- See also: WikiProject Awards and prizes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
This item is used as a badge and must not be deleted under any circumstances as it is used by the software. | This item (Q20748091) is considered exempted from Wikidata's policy on notability. This means that there has been a consensus at Wikidata talk:Notability that it should be exempted, that this specific page was added to the policy itself without any objections, or that there was at some point an agreement to ignore the policy in this case.
There is not currently any link to a discussion regarding this item. If you can find one, please add it to this template as a first parameter. If you are using a diff or oldid link, please write |
| This entity (Q20748091) is used by Wikimedia's setting of Wikidata. Please contact the development team or file a bug on Phabricator before big changes (renaming, deletion, merging, etc.). |
How to use these badges for Wikisource?
editFWIW, the words "Not proofread, Problematic, Proofread, Validated" are from Category:Not proofread (Q15629459), Category:Problematic (Q15629407), Category:Proofread (Q15627006), and Category:Validated (Q15629403), but these categories are collecting the "Page:" namespace pages, which are excluded as per WD:N. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:22, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that this isn't fully clear. But I guess you cannot claim that a text is validated until all pages in that text is validated.
- Another question is then why "Problematic" was included?
- A third question is also how to handle cases when maybe all pages to the frontpage of "Euclidis Elementa" is validated but not all pages related to each chapter in Elementa isn't validated. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 13:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- So I have looked 2 examples: Si les Canadiennes le voulaient (Q19231924) and Une immortelle (Q19238072), and tried a demo edit on United States Constitution (Q11698). If I have looked correctly, the status should confirm the small bar (on the top-left of corresponding page, below the "Page Source Discussion").
- But therefore some Wikisources still have nothing to do, such as Chinese, as they may still use Template:Textquality (Q15632182) (inactived on enws). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- A problem with United States Constitution (Q11698) is that Wikisource-texts should not share item with Wikipedia-articles and other Wikisource-texts, but that is a completly different question. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 08:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)