Talk:Q3523867
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Toni 001 in topic Subclass of intensive quantity?
Autodescription — thermodynamic material property (Q3523867)
description: thermodynamic property of a material
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “thermodynamic material property” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
thermodynamic material property⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Merge? --Fractaler (talk) 08:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- No, physical property is much broader because it is being used two ways -- most often not specifically of a material. It is not necessarily a property of a material, it can be of a system or object, not the material of which it is composed. For example mass and energy are not properties of a material but are physical properties of a particular system or object (which might perhaps be composed of some material(s)). Actually I would like to make two subclasses of physical property, one for the broad sense of *any* property of a physical system (whether a quantitative property of the system or qualitative like the phase of matter), and the other in the sense used only in chemistry where it is specifically the opposite of a chemical property. DavRosen (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Subclass of intensive quantity? edit
We currently have intensive quantity (Q3387041)subclass of (P279)physical quantity (Q107715). Having also thermodynamic material property (Q3523867)subclass of (P279)intensive quantity (Q3387041) would make material property a subclass of physical quantity. This seem incorrect because, even though some material properties are quantifiable, not all need to be. So I removed the latter statement. Toni 001 (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2020 (UTC)