Talk:Q5167661
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Valentina.Anitnelav in topic Messy split
Autodescription — justice (Q5167661)
description: correct application of law as opposed to arbitrariness
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “justice” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
justice⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
See Valentina's talkPage. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 09:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Messy split edit
I do understand the separation that was made a year ago into justice (Q13189320) and justice (Q5167661), it does make sense, but the separation itself was done rather carelessly. As far as I understand, the content of the articles on the wiki has not been checked at all. Many wikiarticles in justice (Q13189320) still describe concept that should be in justice (Q5167661). We also have equity (Q17713266), which appears to be no different from justice (Q5167661). And there is also still no object for justice as a judicial system in countries. Solidest (talk) 09:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that the split appears careless. I checked the content of each linked Wikipedia article, but if in doubt, I left them with the majority (I made the experience that most Wikipedias prefer to be linked to the English Wikipedia version). If you think that some sitelinks definitely belong to other items please go ahead and move them. The more people participate in such a split, the better. If you think an object for justice as a judicial system is needed, please create one. "We also have equity (Q17713266), which appears to be no different from justice (Q5167661)." I'm not sure about this. There are people who seem to disagree with this [[1]]. Regards - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 10:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- As to equity (Q17713266): the German article should probably not be moved to justice (Q5167661) (the introduction relates this explicitly to German law, but the article is also about the transfer of this concept to other fields). Maybe other articles should be moved to justice (Q5167661), maybe some deserve an own item (I will leave this up to you). - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 10:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- As to justice as judicial system: I found legal order (Q858700). Is this what you were looking for? - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 11:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)