+Edit

 
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:C3
block logipblocklistcrossblockluxo'sunblockremove gblock • contribs: +/-

Request reason:
As my IP switched, I wanted to add to User talk: 2600:387:5:805::17 that I forgot to say that this range, while it has been disruptive on many wikis([1], [2], [3], that the edits here weren’t abusive. Per w:en:WP:IAR, you may ignore rules(including w:en:WP:SOCK) as long as it doesn’t breach w:en:WP:NOTHERE and proves the encyclopedia/database. 2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:C3 22:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
per Special:Diff/1285687649MisterSynergy (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


'

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | français | Nederlands | português | русский | +/−

@Jasper Deng: please don’t revoke my TPA over this, I made a 2nd appeal over at 2600:387:5:805::17, and as my IP switched I carried it over. Anyway, a /60 is SIXTEEN /64’s, and can lead to collateral. I understand why you picked this range(check above), but can you at least turn it into a soft block so that good faith users may edit freely? 2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:C3 22:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.