User talk:AnBuKu/Archive 1

Main account is in the German language Wikipedia AnBuKu

Congratulations! You won the Wikidata DACH Culture Contest!

You won the 2nd place of the 2023 DACH Culture Contest for Wikidata's 10th Börthday in the category Culture of Austria, Germany or Switzerland. Thank you for your amazing effort to enrich the data! We will be in touch regarding your prize soon! --Claudia.Garad (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Salt!

Glad to read and thx a lot for the prize! :-) cheeeers, h. AnBuKu (talk) 16:26, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Descriptions

Please note that Wikidata descriptions don't end with punctuation. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@ Sjoerd de Bruin: Thanks for advice. As I'm a wikidata newbie, I'm thankful for advise and support. Little sideremark: Have fixed translation of brewery description from "Herstellung" to "Herstellung und Verkauf", thus it's the same as in English. AnBuKu (talk) 20:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Merge

@ Sjoerd de Bruin: A question to you as an experienced wikidata contributor: Have made a mistake by opening Egelsee a second time. Starting from commons (Category:Egelsee (Stadt Bern), I haven't realized, that https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5347747 was already existing and opened the same topic a second time https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q56088362. How to merge the two things? Or how to cancel my second opening? Couldn't find any answers in this regard... :-( - Thanks in advance for any input or help. AnBuKu (talk) 22:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Enable the merge gadget for this in your preferences next time! :) Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

@ Sjoerd de Bruin: Thank you so much for your help! :-) AnBuKu (talk) 14:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Zetter House (Q29881353): Korrektur der deutschen Beschreibung

Könntest Du in der deutschen Beschreibung "Geböude" korrigieren. Die Seite ist "semi-protected", ich kann es nicht selber korrigieren. Gruss, --Lu-xin (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

@Lu-xin: Done. Danke für den Hinweis. Keine Ahnung wieso "semi-protected". cheeers, AnBuKu (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Explanations on my modification

Grüezi AnBuKu ,DBs like Wikidata use atomic values as a classification of information. Example: the father of the father - that is to say the grandfather - will not be classified under grandfather or added to father. We must try to put the located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) immediately above. Otherwise, we can go very far in the reasoning: La Sallaz is a neighborhood of Lausanne, which is a city of the Canton of Vaud, which is a canton of Switzerland, which is a country on Earth, which is a planet of the solar system, etc. Otherwise, when using SPARQ, the results will be skewed, as there will be duplicates or triplets which will be unnecessary. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Following your intervention on the Jura1 TP

Hello again,So according to you, you are still wondering: who is right, me or Jura1? First of all, I'm glad you're contributing to WD: WD's strength is the number of users. Continue to contribute to advance knowledge. Precisely, I took the liberty of writing to you because you add a lot of locations, since your beginnings on WD and in the same way. I only corrected the last ones you did. Rest assured, I make a lot of mistakes too. But this community, you or me, makes it possible to help each other and to become more effective. Since it is necessary, I will go further in the explanation. Everything is in the "basic" help pages of Wikidata. A more obvious example is taxonomy. Let's go back to the example in the previous section on the issue of parentage. The grandfather is not on WD and also the grandmother. But we can go further in the absurd: if there is grandfather and grandmother, why not add cousins, aunts, great-great-great-grandmothers, etc. For the location, it's the same: if there is Kanton Waadt, why not add Switzerland, Europe, Earth, Milky Way, etc. Now, think about doing this on all Items. WD goes from a simple structure to a dense, bulky and unmanageable structure with items that are too long. SPARQL would be overwhelmed by the results. Contrary to the writings of Jura1, it is not the ranks or the date of creation that allows to add additional values ​​(of P131), it is the qualifiers. For example, when a location overlaps 2 territories, another value can be added along with a qualifier for each territory. Ranks are used to make a value depreciated or preferred (Moutier (Q67157) around 2025). Thanks for the long read. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 00:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Salut @Eihel: :-) Thx a lot for your time and your explanations!

These lines are very helpful to me for my future work in terms of better quality and less workload, one line, in "located in the administrative territorial entity".

My main interest in WD is due to mash-up projects (e.g. Public art in Bern) and interlinking Wikipedia with Wikimedia and with Wikidata (and with OpenStreetMap) for KGS items lists (e.g. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorie:Liste_(Kulturgüter_im_Kanton_Waadt x 26) here in Switzerland, what need updates for every single list with "|WD-Item = " in each line.

Anyhow, thx again for your work and time. cheeers, AnBuKu (talk) 00:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of valid statements from Wikidata

Hi AnBuKu,

There was some back and forth on various talk pages about this and a few other points.

Just to make it clear: do not delete P131 statements from municipalities, as you did here or here. These municipalities are located in these cantons, thus the statements are valid. The districts they are located in change, but the cantons haven't in quite some time.

If you, for whatever reason, you want to use the current district in preference, you can set that to preferred rank (sample).

If you have problems with queries due to this approach, please request help at Wikidata:Request a query and we (or I) will try to sort it out. --- Jura 00:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear @Jura1: and dear @Eihel:

Friendly speaking, for the moment I'll focus on every thing but WD. It's not fun. cheers, h. AnBuKu (talk) 00:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

P131

Hi, how are you? I have arrived here because I was seeing that several items had been included in P131 (example), when this is not necessary, you only have to indicate the most specific one and the rest can be obtained through queries. Could you remove all the ones you have added? Thank you and best regards. --Vanbasten 23 (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm OK, and you? Maybe you give a read to the statement above. One contributor told me just to use the smallest entity in P131 and nothing more (at least this was my understanding) and an other contributor shouted on me, when I deleted existing statements with bigger entities and just left the smallest one.

So, what to do? BTW, I can't remember "all the ones you have added"... :-( cheeers and best regards AnBuKu (talk) 18:39, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Just read Wikidata usage instructions (P2559) of located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) (You only need to add the most local admin territory, but check that item also has a P131, with the next level, and so on) and see items from Wikidata property example (P1855) (Seattle (Q5083), Eiffel Tower (Q243), University District (Q2001177)). I came here to say this after seeing your edits at Thun District (Q666313). Also note that correct statements of past must be of normal rank, not deprecated. For example, Soviet Union (Q15180) has normal rank as country (P17) for Moscow (Q649).Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 15:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello. My edits at Thun District (Q666313)? You mean Thun (Q68978), right? Ok, normal rank and not deprectate in that case. The most local admin territory is true for processing wikidata. Sometimes its just nice for human readers, it they see as well the canton (for CH) and not the smallest unit, usually a municipality (for CH), only. Anyhow, thx for your input AnBuKu (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I mean Thun (Q68978). We need to maintain correct filling of data even if it looks unexpected for human readers. The data is used by various algorithms and queries taking into account the documentation of properties. Incorrect data generates errors. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 18:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Domdidier : distric de la broye

Bonjour, pour quel raison l'affirmation "Domdidier dans le distric de la Broye" a-t-elle été retirée ? même si la commune a fusionnée, l'objet me semblait correctement décrit Marc wik (talk) 12:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Salut, better now (have fixed some stuff)AnBuKu (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)?

Please follow English capitalization rules

The names of buildings are capitalized in English. Many of the English labels that you are adding are not in the correct form. Building names are proper nouns and are capitalized in English. For example, on Ecumenical Centre (Q55415249) ecumenical centre should have been Ecumenical Centre. And in Glashütten Reformed Church (Q17483958) I changed Glashütten reformed church to Glashütten Reformed Church. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for that.

As I'm not an English native speaker, mistakes like that might happen as well in the future. Or, do you wish, that I stop contributing to Wikidata?

Seasons greetings, AnBuKu (talk) 00:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment

Dear AnBuKu

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender model that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our model based on your previous edits.

Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study should take no more than 20 minutes.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link

Then, I will contact you with the link to start the study.

In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Category:Cultural properties of national significance in Switzerland and Wikidata

Hallo AnBuKu, analog zu

• Commons:Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Germany and Wikidata
• Commons:Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Austria and Wikidata
• Commons:Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Italy and Wikidata

gibt es die Wartungskategorie

• Commons:Category:Cultural properties of national significance in Switzerland and Wikidata

Siehe auch:

• de:Benutzer:M2k~dewiki/FAQ#Wartungskategorien_für_denkmalgeschützte_Objekte_/_Wikidata-Link_in_Commons-Vorlagen_zur_einfacheren_Suche_und_Zuordnung_zu_WD-Objekten

M2k~dewiki (talk) 10:12, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Danke, hab' deinen Input aufgeführt: de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt_Schweiz/Kulturgüterschutzinventar#Inputs_von_Benutzer:M2k~dewiki AnBuKu (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)