Please comment here on issues with the bot's operation.


Adding 'instance of': 'determinator for date of periodic occurrence'Edit

D2-bot has been adding 'instance of (P31)': 'point in time with respect to recurrent timeframe (Q14795564)' to items for days of the year. I think this works better with 'instance of (P31)": 'calendar date (Q205892)' instead as 'calendar date (Q205892)' has 43 linked wikipedia articles. Could D2-bot change these statements?

I have added the statement 'subclass of (P279)': 'point in time with respect to recurrent timeframe (Q14795564)' to the item for 'calendar date (Q205892)' so this can still be used to define a class for the range of 'day in year for periodic occurrence (P837)'.

I think we also need to add the statements

to every day of the year item. Could D2-bot do this? Filceolaire (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

We need to add part of (P361): January (Q108) or relevant month to all these items as well. Can D2-bot do this? Can I help with this?
Meanwhile I'm working on adding properties follows (P155) and followed by (P156) by hand, to link each day with the adjacent days. Filceolaire (talk) 19:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
I can add the months by bot. If you want to give it a try, you could to it with Wikidata Useful as well. --  Docu  at 19:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
I've not used Wikidata Useful before. I'll try that out. Thanks. Filceolaire (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

determinator for date of periodic occurrenceEdit

I saw you have been adding 'instance of (P31)': 'point in time with respect to recurrent timeframe (Q14795564)' to items for days of the year. I think this works better with 'instance of (P31)": 'calendar date (Q205892)' instead as 'calendar date (Q205892)' has 43 linked wikipedia articles.

I have added the statement 'subclass of (P279)': 'point in time with respect to recurrent timeframe (Q14795564)' to the item for 'calendar date (Q205892)' so this can still be used to define a class for the range of 'day in year for periodic occurrence (P837)'.

I think 'instance of (P31)': 'point in time with respect to recurrent timeframe (Q14795564)' should be removed from the items for days of the year. Filceolaire (talk) 18:32, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Interesting idea, but I'm not sure if we mixed the rather technical Q14795564 with Q205892 what this leads to. Is there an issue if we had both on items? --  Docu  at 18:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
The main issue would be duplication. I have been thinking some more about this - whether 'subclass of' would be more appropriate than 'instance of' and have stopped marking the days up till I get it straight in my head - just give me a few days! Filceolaire (talk) 13:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Property:P131Edit

Hallo, in the past few days, you added Q980 in Property:P131 to some villages in Bavaria. While it is perfectly true that Bavaria is a higher administrative unit, the next unit up the tree would be the respective Landkreis (county), which itself is part of a Regierungsbezirk (district), which then is part of Bavaria. Did you jump the levels intentionally (then it´s ok for me) or was it just a lack of data concerning the Landkreis-affiliation of each village? If it´s the latter, I´d be happy to provide a list for all of the 2000+ villages in Bavaria to you to assist in a finer allocation. Viele Grüße, --Rudolph Buch (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

P131 can hold several layers of administrative levels. If you prepare a list with elements like:
Please add property located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) with value Upper Bavaria (Q10562) to en:Category:Upper Bavaria geography stubs
pwb.py claimit P131 Q10562 -cat:"en:Category:Upper Bavaria geography stubs"
I could add these as well. It can work with German Wikipedia categories too. --  Docu  at 17:27, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately, DE-Wikipedia does not (yet?) categorize towns by county or district so this won´t work. All I could offer is a list like de:Liste der Kreiszugehörigkeit bayerischer Gemeinden but that obviously doesn´t fit the bot´s needs at all. Thanks nontheless. --Rudolph Buch (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
It should be possible do something with the infobox. When I have some time, I might look into it. --  Docu  at 20:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!Edit

Thanks for getting on to the big, but simple task of adding country to items. Nice to see a bot ploughing through that tedious task.

Perhaps you can do some of these requests? User talk:Legobot/properties.js/requests Some of them are very straight forward category based, and hopefully don't need any complicated error checking. e.g. Alumni of... categories. Danrok (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

As you made quite a few, I will try to plow through some of your requests. The bot doesn't do item creation yet though. Further, sometimes it crashes half way through a list. --  Docu  at 21:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)