User talk:Multichill/Archives/2016/November
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Multichill in topic Identifiers 1995
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Episode
Do you suppose we should change all episode (Q1983062) with television series episode (Q21191270)? --Infovarius (talk) 11:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hey Infovarius, I'm using Wikidata:WikiProject Movies/Properties. I don't think we should change every instance of episode (Q1983062), only the cases where it's actually a television series episode (Q21191270). It could also be radio or maybe a book? I think this query contains a good list of candidates. This was actually just a bit of preparation work. I want to import missing imdb id's for TV episodes. The the list of items not in the previous list contains quite a few mistakes. Want to help to change the first list and fix the mistakes in the second list? Multichill (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ok. I've done the first. And I think about the second. --Infovarius (talk) 07:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hoi Maarten. Ik zie dat de item heeft een inventarisnummer maar staat nog in de lijst van de Prado schilderijen. Wat mis ik in de situacie?--Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hoi Yaroslav, het is heel snel gegaan. Een aantal weken geleden waren vrijwel alle missende inventarisnummers aangevuld. Ik heb toen de missende schilderijen van de Prado website toegevoegd. User:Multichill/Paintings in the Prado geeft dus nu alle schilderijen in het Prado weer. De paar schilderijen die over zijn zonder inventarisnummer zijn de lastige puzzel klusjes. Wellicht niet meer in het museum of zelfs nooit geweest. In ieder geval bedankt voor het meehelpen! Multichill (talk) 20:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oke, duidelijk. Bedankt.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Identifiers 1995
Hello, I'm not sure about these edits of your bot. Are you sure about them? --Horcrux92 (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Horcrux92: I'm completely sure these are wrong. The bot just looks up the FAST ID (P2163) and adds the missing information. If some adds a ridiculous FAST-ID claim, the bot will just add more weird claims based on that. Fortunately these errors don't go unnoticed. I've undone the original incorrect edit and the resulting addition. Thanks for finding this one. Multichill (talk) 20:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)