Removal of KSH code from Abaújkér and Abaújalpár edit

Hello! Hope all is well. I removed the KSH Code from the citations of those two locations because it was causing the wikidata generated citation on enwiki at en:Abaújkér and en:Abaújalpár to not work and show an error. I wasn't sure how to leave an edit summary as it seems once I edited that, it just published it without a way to explain why. Apologies if that caused any problems, as I am much less on wikidata than on enwiki. All the best! TartarTorte (talk) 00:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@TartarTorte: It’s indeed difficult to specify an edit summary; except for reverts, a third-party tool (e.g. a gadget or user script) is needed.
Actually, I don’t understand why error messages appear: according to the documentation, {{Cite Q}} should be called in this situation (no reference URL (P854) or title (P1476), but stated in (P248), publication date (P577), retrieved (P813) and an appropriate external ID are present). —Tacsipacsi (talk) 23:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Tacsipacsi, you reverted my commit and added the statement again. I added a comment why the statements are wrong on the discussion page [1] already in a previous revert which is undisputed. If there is no item that qualifies as a subclass this is no reason to put in wrong ones. Apart from that, if subclass statements are added carelessly and you want to query e.g. all instances of mathematical concepts, you end up with Paris Metro, New-York Metro etc. because network was a subclass of mathematical concept, transport network subclass of network, rapid transit subclass of transport network, which means all instances of rapid transit are mathematical concepts...--2003:F2:6714:C00:7800:69A7:4ABB:463F 20:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply