Wikidata:Property proposal/Media Bias/Fact Check ID

Media Bias/Fact Check ID edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

Descriptionidentifier of a publication, organization, or person at Media Bias/Fact Check
RepresentsMedia Bias/Fact Check (Q60741379)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domainorganization (Q43229) / mass media (Q11033) / human (Q5)
Allowed values[a-z]+(\-[a-z]+)*
Example 1The Guardian (Q11148)the-guardian
Example 2American Council on Science and Health (Q4743553)american-council-on-science-and-health
Example 3CNN (Q48340)cnn-bias
Example 4Fox News (Q186068)fox-news-bias
Example 5Der Standard (Q128660)der-standard-bias
Example 6Dan Bongino (Q16200445)dan-bongino-bias-rating
Example 7Anderson Cooper (Q316997)anderson-cooper-bias-rating
Example 8Coast to Coast AM (Q1933766)coast-to-coast-am
Sourcehttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
External linksUse in sister projects: [ar][de][en][es][fr][he][it][ja][ko][nl][pl][pt][ru][sv][vi][zh][commons][species][wd][en.wikt][fr.wikt].
Mix'n'match3856
Number of IDs in source>2880
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URLhttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/$1
See alsoPolitiFact people and groups ID (P2267)
Distinct-values constraintyes

Motivation edit

Media Bias/Fact Check is a popular database that assesses partisan bias and credibility of media outlets and people. It also includes information on history and transparency (or lack thereof) of owners, editors, funders, etc. While consensus on English Wikipedia currently deems it generally unreliable for the purpose of encyclopedic references (largely due to being self-published), it is frequently included as a university-level resource for fact-checking and critical source analysis, alongside other resources like FactCheck.org (Q5428664) and PolitiFact.com (Q3394318) (e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4]). Self-published/user-generated external identifiers are by no means forbidden nor rare on Wikidata items, as evidenced by the likes of IMDb ID (P345), Fandom wiki ID (P4073), Geni.com profile ID (P2600), etc. Most profiles of journalists/commentators appear to be available only to subscribers, however these represent a vast minority of profiles (at present only 21 out of over 2,500 rankings).
Note: The structure of the Formatter URL is somewhat variable- most IDs appear to be in the "default" form of mediabiasfactcheck.com/$1, while others are mediabiasfactcheck.com/left/$1 (as in cnn-bias), but plugging "cnn-bias" into the default form redirects to the intended link. There may well be other URL formats such as mediabiasfactcheck.com/right, mediabiasfactcheck.com/far-left, etc. -Animalparty (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

Hannes Röst: The presence of ads are unfortunate, and may be worse than many other identifiers, but is by no means unique to this site (see for instance PolitiFact people and groups ID (P2267), AllMusic artist ID (P1728), IMDb ID (P345), Discogs artist ID (P1953), Know Your Meme ID (P6760) Guardian topic ID (P3106) or Fandom article ID (P6262) with ad-blockers disabled), but the vast majority of articles appear to be freely available. From what I can tell, all media outlet rankings (>2,000) are freely viewable (their Least Biased list alone has over 500 viewable articles), while at present, only "journalist" rankings (i.e. humans) appear to be exclusive to paid subscribers, which make up a miniscule proportion of the sites rankings: at press time, there are only 21 "journalists", of which all but one paywalled. I think the site's value in fact-checking/credibility assessment/partisanship analysis outweighs the obnoxious ads (which are circumventable by using adblocking software), and offers content not readily found in similar external links (PolitiFact for instance tends to assess the veracity of individual statements by people/organizations, not the partisanship or credibility of the people/organizations overall). -Animalparty (talk) 04:15, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]