Open main menu

Wikidata:Property proposal/Number of nodes

number of nodesEdit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Not done
DescriptionCantidad de nodos que compone una supercomputadora
Data typeNumber (not available yet)
Template parameter|nodos= at Plantilla:Ficha de hardware (Spanish Wikipedia)
Example 1Aitken (Q66763804) "1150"
Example 2Columbia (Q1112414) "40"
Example 3Endeavour (Q16992571) "2"
Planned useTo be used mainly for supercomputer infoboxes

MotivaciónEdit

I returnned to propose some new properties. This is intended for tell the amount of nodes that make up a superscalar supercomputer. Amitie 10g (talk) 13:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

has parts of the class (P2670) with quantity (P1114) should do the job. ChristianKl❫ 14:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Maybe, but I don't think simplifying the properties with more ambiguous term actually simplify the process of making infoboxes.
In what way is this more ambigious? It's clear expression of the fact with our existing semantics.
It's a bit easier for a specific infobox where there are properties that are made for that specific infobox but in Wikidata we try to create properties that can be used in multiple contexts. ChristianKl❫ 17:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Tobias1984
Emw
Zuphilip
Danrok
Bene*
콩가루
TomT0m
DrSauron
Ruud Koot
Andreasburmeister
Ilya
Toto256
MichaelSchoenitzer
Metamorforme42
Pixeldomain
User:YULdigitalpreservation
Dipsode87
Pintoch
Daniel Mietchen
Jsamwrites
Tinker Bell
FabC
Jasc PL
putnik
Dhx1
Tris T7
Peb Aryan
lore.mazza004
Rc1959
Premeditated
Iwan.Aucamp
LiberatorG
  Notified participants of WikiProject Informatics Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

  Oppose like ChristianKl, better reuse existing properties to avoid problems with special cases. -- MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 00:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  Oppose same view as ChristianKl. John Samuel (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
  • As another solution has been provided, I'll edit the module to add the qualifier. If successful, I'll discard this proposal. The only issue with has parts of the class (P2670) is somewhat ambiguous, but I'll attempt to document as best as possible. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)