Wikidata:Property proposal/Relationship Science profile ID

Relationship Science profile ID edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

Done: Relationship Science organization ID (P5181) (Talk and documentation)

Description	identifier for an organization in the Relationship Science database
Represents	Relationship Science (Q7310742)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	organization (Q43229)
Allowed values	[a-z0-9\-]+
Example	Opera Software (Q52833902) → otello-corp-asa-521154
Source	https://relationshipscience.com
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Planned use	To add RelSci IDs for organizations
Number of IDs in source	1.6 million organizations
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://relationshipscience.com/organization/$1
See also	Bloomberg company ID (P3377)

Motivation

Extensive database on business entities, organizations and related persons. Gotitbro (talk) 18:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Support David (talk) 13:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose @Gotitbro: We can't have two formatter URLs as shown; so we either need two properties or to include the organization/ and person/ string as part of the ID. I'd favour the former. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I see, in that case yes including the organization string would be better. Gotitbro (talk) 17:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - On further examination, it seems that links like https://relationshipscience.com/organization/superior-auto-inc-25472233 and https://relationshipscience.com/stephan-ducharme-p4380827 will work, and redirect as appropriate. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Gotitbro: the simples way forward would probably be to restrict this proposal to one of the types (the one you want to get created first) and create a new proposal for the other type − Pintoch (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pintoch: Done. I have edited the proposal for organizations only. Gotitbro (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pintoch, Gotitbro, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Pigsonthewing: Done: Relationship Science organization ID (P5181). − Pintoch (talk) 08:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pintoch: Why was this created, just fifteen minutes after the proposal was heavily refactored? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restricting a proposal to one of the subtypes is a routine fix IMHO. Do you have any other concerns about the proposal? − Pintoch (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]