Wikidata:Property proposal/Reposcope ID
Reposcope ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Not done
Description | identifier for a software (category) on Reposcope |
---|---|
Represents | Reposcope (Q96582794) |
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | software (Q7397), media type (Q1667978), software category (Q17155032) |
Allowed values | (package|applications?|mimetype)\/[\w\-+.]+ |
Example 1 | Structure-data file (Q55738541) → mimetype/chemical/x-mdl-sdfile |
Example 2 | kakoune (Q28974962) → package/kakoune |
Example 3 | IRC client (Q10417670) → applications/ircclient |
Example 4 | Mozilla Firefox (Q698) → application/firefox |
Source | https://reposcope.com/ |
External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
Planned use | Adding the ID to some data items |
Number of IDs in source | unknown |
Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
Formatter URL | https://reposcope.com/$1 |
Robot and gadget jobs | Bots could be written to fill out depends on software (P1547) and official website (P856) and update software version identifier (P348) if a package name is given. I do not think that we need another User:Repology bot. |
See also | Repology project name (P6931) |
Motivation edit
Reposcope lists dependencies, data sizes, media types, and hosts man pages while Repology does not. —Dexxor (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Discussion edit
@AMDmi3:
Notified participants of WikiProject Informatics/FLOSS
I wonder whether this property should be split into packages, applications and software categories (there are so few media types on Wikidata that they are not worth a separate property). —Dexxor (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Dexxor, AMDmi3: Not done Stale and unsupported. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2021 (UTC)