Wikidata:Property proposal/accreditation
accreditation edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
| Description | accreditation |
|---|---|
| Represents | diplomatic accreditation (Q822445); if used in a broader sense possibly additionally: Q419915 and educational accreditation (Q419911) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | instance of (Q21503252):
|
| Example |
|
| Source | for example: European Parliament;German Bundestag |
| Robot and gadget jobs | reconcile with lobby registers |
| See also | EU Transparency Register ID (P2657) |
Motivation
The intention behind this proposal is to be able to store accreditations of organisations in Wikidata, mainly for a political context. However, if necessary the domain of this proposal can be broadend in order to allow other types of accreditations like press accreditations or academic accreditations too.
Additional requirements could be:
- start time (P580)
- end time (P582)
- represented by (P1875) for organisations, represents (P1268) for people
Naseweis520 (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
Support David (talk) 14:44, 5 April 2018 (UTC)- @Naseweis520: I like the idea but I am worried that a given organization might have a lot of accreditations, which could be too much for a Wikidata item. What do you think? − Pintoch (talk) 08:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Naseweis520: ^ − Pintoch (talk) 14:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: The narrow definition of diplomatic accreditations shouldn't be much of an issue. But you're right, depending on how broad this proposed property is defined the number of accreditions per Wikidata-item could become too high. Possible countermeasures could be to only allow certain bigger accreditation-granting organisations or to keep the narrow definition of only diplomatic accreditations. --Naseweis520 (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- OK, Support then. We can see how it goes. Marked as ready. − Pintoch (talk) 17:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- OK,
- @Pintoch: The narrow definition of diplomatic accreditations shouldn't be much of an issue. But you're right, depending on how broad this proposed property is defined the number of accreditions per Wikidata-item could become too high. Possible countermeasures could be to only allow certain bigger accreditation-granting organisations or to keep the narrow definition of only diplomatic accreditations. --Naseweis520 (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Naseweis520, Pintoch: 
Done: accredited by (P5514). − Pintoch (talk) 22:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)