Wikidata:Property proposal/psychological test result
psychological test result edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
| Description | result of a psychological test that a person took (only use this property with a reference). Use with qualifier "determined by test" |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | human (Q5) |
| Example | Stephen Colbert (Q212886) → INFP (Q2670566) "determined by test" Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Q897939) |
- From en:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator: "the MBTI exhibits significant psychometric deficiencies, notably including poor validity (i.e. not measuring what it purports to measure) and poor reliability (giving different results for the same person on different occasions)." Therefore: Oppose'. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Oppose. - PKM (talk) 22:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Not done; no support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:33, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
determined by test edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
| Description | qualifier for "psychological test result" that specifies the test that was used |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | qualifier for "psychological test result" |
| Example | Stephen Colbert (Q212886) psychological test result INFP (Q2670566) → Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Q897939) |
- Motivation
It's worthwhile to be able to store the results of tests like the IQ test and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Q897939) in Wikidata. ChristianKl (talk) 09:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Comment are there really reliable sources for this information? How many individuals would we have data for? It would be mostly BLP data so we definitely want it sourced (and I'm glad your description emphasizes that). ArthurPSmith (talk) 16:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- http://flavorwire.com/540287/stephen-colbert-reveals-his-myers-briggs-personality-type would be an example of a source for the claim about Stephan Colbert. ChristianKl (talk) 20:38, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Haven't we had this one before? From en:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator: "the MBTI exhibits significant psychometric deficiencies, notably including poor validity (i.e. not measuring what it purports to measure) and poor reliability (giving different results for the same person on different occasions)." Therefore: Oppose'. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- The fact that certain information isn't interesting to everyone and some people might not care about Stephan Colberts status, doesn't mean that it isn't useful information for some people. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChristianKl (talk • contribs) at 20:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC).
- Where did I refer to "Interest"? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- The fact that certain information isn't interesting to everyone and some people might not care about Stephan Colberts status, doesn't mean that it isn't useful information for some people. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChristianKl (talk • contribs) at 20:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC).
- Interesting question about scope. In principle, should Wikidata include information that is of dubious theoretical validity and where should it draw the line? I assume "religion" is in scope while "number of Yeti sightings" would not be. The Land (talk) 12:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Why not qualifier determination method (P459)? Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)