Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mokbul Alam

13 June 2020 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Both are new accounts who have recreated promotional items about a person named "Chris M. Walker". Please see Q96145837 and Q96024683. Trade (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Results:

  Doing… --Sotiale (talk) 14:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Completed
  •   Confirmed Group 1: Mokbul Alam, Ogimodia, Johan David1, Stepen Jonson
  •   Confirmed Group 2: Obisek Kumar, Robin Khana

  •   Possible Group 1 and 2.
  • These users used VPN.

But in my opinion, these are just the same users, because of VPN, the technical data is slightly less identified. All blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 15:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

29 June 2020 edit

Same, used VPN. No sleepers found, blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 06:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Montagu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate)--Trade (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sotiale:--Trade (talk) 19:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same, blocked. --Sotiale (talk) 04:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14 January 2021 edit

Recreated the item--Trade (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC) @1997kB:--Trade (talk) 12:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Completed


  •   Possible Group 1, 2 and 3 and to previous accounts in case.
  • All of them are on same proxy.

Comparing their contributions it looks like they are just spam only accounts, so blocked all. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Their creations: Q104000731 (‎Chris M. Walker), Q104828815 (‎Artem Shestakov), Q104091801 (‎]Avreeayl Womack O'Neil), Q101072765 (‎Jason Harriman) and Q104816295 (Aziz Hossain). Will be handy in future. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02 February 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Re-created previously deleted item. Trade (talk) 22:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Unrelated to previous socks. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17 February 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Re-creation of previously deleted item. Trade (talk) 09:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@1997kB: Also SteprnMular0 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) recreated an aforementioned item. Lymantria (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: Both are   Likely to previous socks. Blocked and tagged. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 12:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

31 March 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Recreation of item on Artem Shestakov. Lymantria (talk) 20:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Possible. They are using VPN, but based on their device, edits, and history, I would say   Likely.-BRP ever 02:39, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked and tagged.-BRP ever 02:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


20 November 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Recreation again of item on Artem Shestakov. Lymantria (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: The following are   Confirmed to be the same. The older socks are all   Stale and thus need to be connected on behavioral grounds only.

--Jasper Deng (talk) 10:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22 November 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Recreation of item, similar user name. Lymantria (talk) 21:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results:   Possible based on proxy usage. I’d say yes based on behavior.—Jasper Deng (talk) 21:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

27 November 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: User name similarities and common subjects of interest with earlier socks. Lymantria (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: We have the following   Confirmed to the above Daweah Sckson group:

All blocked and tagged.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05 December 2021 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Similar construction of user names and similar or same subjects. Lymantria (talk) 17:37, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still needs attention. Lymantria (talk) 14:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Results: Sorry for taking so much time. Here are the results:

  •   Confirmed: Kseie Aqwsa, Alexsa Ambani, Nieish Asjput, and all other accounts in Category:Wikidata sockpuppets of Alexsa Ambani
  •   Likely: Tyois Qwens, Aqler Oiijns, Sndres Amriver, and the confirmed accounts above.
  •   Stale: Miasing Ninsw

I couldn't verify any technical relation with Hongfei Yeasw (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log· investigate) but behaviorally it looks related. Thanks-BRP ever 08:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11 January 2022 edit

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Similar or same subjects and similar user name construction. Lymantria (talk) 22:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results: We have Cherisher James   Confirmed to Fncis Sanaw. The others look   Likely but I will need to dig further.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I blocked all after combining with behavioural evidence. Lymantria (talk) 06:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

26 January 2022 edit

moved from Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Liawn Mwqeh

Rationale, discussion and results edit

Reason: Each created an item on two closely related subjects, the second edited the first item as well. User names have some similarity. Lymantria (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results:

  •   Confirmed Awgar Swjabli, Liawn Mwqeh and Swqair Saqda

These accounts are confirmed to be sockpuppets of Dawea Sckson. Blocked and tagged. Thanks-BRP ever 12:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]