Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/09/06

Linked from Facile.it (Q111450281), which, while promotional, seems notable per [1]. I guess that might make this subsidiary sufficiently notable as well, but leaving this request up for discussion for now. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

@JustAnotherArchivist seems to be a typical company case. Do we have WD users good at company RFDs. My common sense says that if a parent company is notable, then all its subsidiaries are not automatically notable (enwiki confirms it: en:Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#No_inherited_notability) Estopedist1 (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

I wonder if there is a valid argument about structural need. But there has to be a line somewhere, and I'm not quite sure where it might be in that area. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 20:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@JustAnotherArchivist one week passed, no additional input. In this case appropriate action may be "procedural oppose", because probably all subsidiaries of Facile.it are not notable. So, in future, bulk deletion request is encouraged. But this RFD can be closed as "procedural oppose" Estopedist1 (talk) 08:06, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

@Estopedist1 Are you saying I should create a new bulk request for all the subsidiaries? Sure, I can do that. Not sure what that would change though since the same people would see that as did this request, and nobody else commented here... –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 05:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

@JustAnotherArchivist yep, bulk request should be best solution. If all subsidiaries are not notable, then we can finish this RFD and the bulk-RFD (not created yet). You never know who will be participating in a bulk-RFD Estopedist1 (talk) 05:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

@Estopedist1: I've started a bulk request (including Q111477949), so I guess we can close this one in favour of that. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 22:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Not deleted procedural oppose. Bulk deletion request is created (Wikidata:Requests for deletions#Bulk deletion request: subsidiaries of Facile.it (Q111450281) Estopedist1 (talk) 05:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

Q113633599 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q113536730 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q113633604 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q113001496 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Cross-wiki promo spam, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --Lymantria (talk) 05:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113676229

Q113676229: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promo, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113093292

Q113093292: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, it was deleted before (Q112110228), can someone also make his spam on the forsaken xh wiki deleted? (https://xh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asakhe_Nojoko) --64.79.242.56 17:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

It was deleted before as an empty item. This item is not empty and has a valid sitelink. We can't delete it while there's an article, and it does not appear that anyone has requested deletion of the article. Bovlb (talk) 18:38, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

@Bovlb can you delete it now? 64.79.242.59 11:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113772815

Q113772815: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikidata lover spambot Praxidicae (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113772598

Q113772598: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikidata lover spambot Praxidicae (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113772483

Q113772483: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikidata lover spambot Praxidicae (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113756758

Q113756758: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Xwiki vanity spam Praxidicae (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113754580

Q113754580: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Userpage item, vanity spam Praxidicae (talk) 14:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113776768

Q113776768: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Erreur, programme de plusieurs courts métrages Mith (talk) 15:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q42900780

Mālupe Manor (Q42900780): Latvian cultural monument No. 2800: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q45854137 --Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 15:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Merged @Dāvis Kļaviņš:. Bovlb (talk) 16:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Saw that "duplicate items should be merged, not deleted" only after submitting. Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 16:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113586307

Q113586307: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

His IMDB entry is quite detail. But hard to find serious sources Estopedist1 (talk) 14:55, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

IMDb entries can be created by anyone, but there are some articles mentioning him (all from Iranian media outlets with enwiki pages):

–JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 23:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

@JustAnotherArchivist these URLs are only bare mentioning of S. V. Olyaee. I vote for

Delete. By the way, item is practically empty Estopedist1 (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

@Estopedist1 Yeah, best I could find. I'm not sure how broad 'described' should be understood in WD:N criterion 2, to be honest. These sources do describe him in some sense though (as a film producer). –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q104093498

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Projects (Q104093498): Wikimedia project page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vandalism — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 19:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@Jeff G. not a deletion request, but the item is protected. Can we close this RFD? Estopedist1 (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

@Estopedist1: The LTA is using Q104093498 in vandalism. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 09:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

@Jeff G. but why do you want to delete this item? The item is already protected from 1 July 2022‎ by user:Stang Estopedist1 (talk) 15:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Not deleted Bovlb (talk) 22:25, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q34385142

Q34385142: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikinews categories have to be lied to Wikipédia articles and don't have separated item. Wyslijp16 (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

@Wyslijp16: Could you point to a source for this claim? Bovlb (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Il est fortement recommandé de créer des catégories et de les lier aux articles Wikipédia. (Aide:Catégorie)

It is strongly recommended to create categories and link them to Wikipedia articles. (Aide:Catégorie) Wyslijp16 (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Looking at WD:N, we have such a rule for Commons categories, but not for Wikinews. I agree that such a rule would make sense and be more consistent, but it does not appear to be there. Bovlb (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113686631

Sebastiano Mestre (Q113686631): initiator of ESC End Summer Camp and FabLab Manager at Crunchlab: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Wh+67 (talk) 06:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:30, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Has a Commons category link. Bovlb (talk) 18:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Note that now the subject is described using at least 3 publicly available references. Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Not deleted Bovlb (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113712509

Stranger Things, season 5 (Q113712509): fifth season of Netflix series Stranger Things: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item FShbib (talk) 04:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Keep Clearly identifiable and notable entity (even though it won't be released until 2024 it seems). –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 05:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Not deleted Bovlb (talk) 18:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113498230

Q113498230: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promo spam, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q20359352

Q20359352: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The template that this item depends on has been deleted. Jesse Viviano (talk) 20:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113792559

Q113792559: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake Sabelöga (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Bovlb (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)