Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Krdbot
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Approved--Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Flag assigned. Vogone talk 19:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved--Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Krdbot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Krd (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s: Update sitelinks for dewiki after page moves.
Function details: Two test edits have been made. --Krd (talk) 14:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do about 50 test edits at low speed. --Ricordisamoa 15:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Live mode activated. Fixed to not process cross-namespace moves. --Krd (talk) 06:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you also change the de label of the moved page if it is the same as the original page see [1] and my edit [2]?
- Added. --Krd 14:14, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I am not really happy if a bot owner has exactly 13 edits on Wikidata. I would rather wait till at least three-digit numbers.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:46, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Your objections are because of trust in the operator, his general clue level at bot operation, or special wikidata experience needed for the intended job? --Krd 16:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Mostly Wikidata experience.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Now we got over a hundred, so I Support.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Your objections are because of trust in the operator, his general clue level at bot operation, or special wikidata experience needed for the intended job? --Krd 16:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Edits don't matter, the bot operator seems to understand how the project works and has been able to incorporate that into the code. The user is a sysop on two wikis and the bot is approved on two wikis aswell. (so trust isn't an issue either) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support All looks good to me, and I would argue that this is one of the few bots that should not stop/slow down because of dispatch lag. Legoktm (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per Legoktm. Just make sure you're here in case there are bugs, since you have low activity. Also, can you see if you can have the bot somehow not add disambiguation to the labels, such as here? Regards, — Moe Epsilon 17:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Added not to add bracketed extensions if the prefix is the same as the original label. --Krd (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I agree with Legoktm. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The bot will be approved in 24h if there are no objections.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]