Wikidata talk:WikiProject Media Representation/Queer+LGBTQA+

Items in need of additional opinions or discussion - LGBTQA+ related tests

In this section you can discuss items where you are unsure of the application of Queer+LGBTQA+-related tests. If there is already a statement/evaluation that you would like to challenge, please ping the originator of the statement/evaluation. You may add nature of statement (P5102) disputed (Q18912752) or dubious (Q104378399) as a qualifier to the statement in question. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 10:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

AfroBubbleGum Test vs. BubbleGum Test

@Wallacegromit1: I'm thinking how to convert this into the new model. The easiest possibility seems to be to have two test items: AfroBubbleGum Test (Q105726358) and one (still to be created) <BubbleGum Test> (or something similar). Then we could have the following applications:

• passes the AfroBubbleGum Test (Q105726358) if the work is AfroBubbleGumist (corresponds to has quality: Q105726911)
• passes the <BubbleGum Test> if the work is BubbleGumist but not AfroBubbleGumist (corresponds to has quality: Q105727442)
• fails the <BubbleGum Test> if the work is neither AfroBubbleGumist nor Bubble Gumist (corresponds to has quality: Q105727461

What do you think? - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@Valentina.Anitnelav:

1. Is there another terminology we can use? Maybe fullfils? AfroBubbleGum and DuVernay tests, purposefully do not want to include the terms "Pass or Fail". The DuVernay test should purely be a score. If no other terminology is available then lets use it.

2. In terms of creating a separate BubbleGum Test makes sense, as we can specify it a little better.

3. Thank You for all the modelling, will change the instruction in the first page to reflect these. Wallacegromit1 (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@Wallacegromit1:

1. I'm not sure if the difference between "pass" and "fulfill" is striking enough to warrant an own item. To me to fulfill the AfroBubbleGum test would be the same as to pass the AfroBubbleGum test. As to the DuVernay test I would just omit the "assessment outcome" qualifier and only add the criteria/score qualifiers.

2.-3. Thanks! - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk)

@Valentina.Anitnelav: Agreed! Wallacegromit1 (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Increase diversity in our Wikidata integrations research

Hello WikiProject Queer+LGBTQA+ editors!

Wikidata for Wikimedia Projects at Wikimedia Deutschland is focused on enhancing data reuse and functionality between Wikidata and its sibling projects. We are sorely lacking diversity in our research and are seeking fresh perspectives.

We are conducting 1-hour interview calls to understand editors' experiences (positive & negative) when integrating Wikidata with other Wikimedia projects (Wikipedia, Commons, Wikisource etc.). Your insights will help ensure the products we build are suitable for all editors, regardless of gender, sexual-orientation, language or experience level.

Interview Information:

• Interviews will be conducted in English.
• Compensation is available.
• Sessions will be scheduled soon and on a rolling basis.
• Sign up here if you are interested.
• Diversity: We are keen to hear from women editors; editors with a diverse gender or sexuality; beginner or casual editing experience and/or those who edit in non-latin or non-western languages.

Thank you for your interest in contributing to our research, Danny Benjafield (WMDE) (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

P.s. We also invite you to write to us if you prefer to contribute in written form. Danny Benjafield (WMDE) (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)