Property talk:P1246

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Herrenloses Damenfahrrad in topic Cultivar patent number doesn't fit the regex

Documentation

DescriptionThings that are (or were) patented have a unique patent number
Representspatent (Q253623)
Data typeExternal identifier
Template parameteren:Template:US patent field #1 - See also Template:Patent (Q6020246).
DomainThings that can be patented (note: this should be moved to the property statements)
Allowed values[A-Z]{2}\d{1,12} (two letters (country code) followed by 1-10 digits)
ExampleKinetite (Q15982768)GB10936
mouse (Q7987)US3987685
TRIAC (Q221499)SU349356
Formatter URLhttps://patents.google.com/patent/$1
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total242,477
Main statement242,370>99.9% of uses
Qualifier24<0.1% of uses
Reference83<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Format “([A-Z]{2}|USX|USRE)\d{1,12}: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1246#Format, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1246#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Format “([A-Z]{2}.+): value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1246#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1246#Entity types
Conflicts with “instance of (P31): human (Q5): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1246#Conflicts with P31, search, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1246#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL


Single value edit

I've removed the single value constraint as many more complex items will have multiple patents related to them (they should probably be qualified with applies to part (P518)). Thryduulf (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sure, but than the type of this property is incorrect. This is not an external identifier. Multichill (talk) 19:44, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
How so? Does the external identifier datatype really require a 1:1 correspondence between items and identifiers? If so, why? Thryduulf (talk) 20:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Change Google Patents URL? edit

Linking to Google Patents seems like a good thing to do, but I'm having trouble with international patents using the current URL format, even when Google has them. The current "http://www.google.com/patents/$1" doesn't seem to work for e.g. http://www.google.com/patents/FR396795; what works is https://patents.google.com/patent/FR396795. US patents seem to work with both URL schemes, e.g. https://www.google.com/patents/US4558302, https://patents.google.com/patent/US4558302. Any objection to changing the URL format to the one that seems to work for more patents? --Joel7687 (talk) 16:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Update: After testing with many more patent numbers, I changed it. --Joel7687 (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

For SU patents it would be better to work as follows edit

http://patents.su/?search=$1&type=number Halfcookie (talk) 00:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Ah! USSR patents.

"Google Patents" limitation. edit

You are trying to convert a universal patent number into a non-universal URL. "Google Patents" is not worldwide patent database. Halfcookie (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can change name from "patent number" to "google patent number"? edit

This item depends on a google patent record. But there are historic patents from (1) patent offices that no longer exist; (2) letters in the name/number; (3) duplication of patent numbers from one year to the next (UK in 1900-1910 at least). For more see Wikidata:WikiProject Patents. So we need something more flexible in general. But this property is useful for those patents that are on google patents. Maybe we can just change the name to "google patent number". @Halfcookie: What do you think? -- econterms (talk) 13:57, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • It would be nice if the URL will be generated by a template with follow parameters: 1) the database type (for most links it would probably will be Google database), 2) the patent number, 3) and the optional parameter is a custom link when template has no rule for conversion patent numbers in the URL. Such a template would help to quickly solve the problems with the restructuring of patent web-sites.

if (not custom_URL)
{
switch ( <base type> )
 {
 case "google" : URL = https://patents.google.com/patent/{{{number}}} 
 case "patents_su" : URL = http://patents.su/?search={{{number}}}&type=number 
 case "something_else" : URL = ...
 }
}
else
{
URL = custom_URL
}

Halfcookie (talk) 17:59, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Patent holder edit

Is there a property for inventing or being the assignee of a patent?

Specifically, I wanted to add the details of which patents he invented to the page for Julius Scherzer (Q57833329)。

Thanks,

--DannyS712 (talk) 00:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm trying to put good practices here. Feel free to edit that. We don't have anything for assignee yet. For a person, there's inventor (Q205375) to say the person is an inventor. -- econterms (talk) 01:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Request for change to this property edit

Draft proposal: Let's split the country and patent-number information. This is useful to cover patents from countries that don't have a two-letter abreivation, and more important to cover situations where patent numbers are reused by a country. Steps:

  • remove the constraints on the formatting of this item
  • add qualifiers for country abbreviation. Usually this will be WIPO ST.3 (P3068): World Intellectual Property Organization standard for the two-letter codes of countries and certain organizations, but sometimes it has to be another kind of country code or abbreviation. Note that some patents were issued by governments that no longer exist, so it's not complete to use only today's WIPO abbreviations.
  • add a qualifier for year because sometimes patent numbers are not unique to a country, e.g. Britain before about 1912 restarted each year at number one.

Comments? @Fuzheado: -- econterms (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Fuzheado: @econterms: definitely needs a qualifier for country; this should be a meta-property pointing to individual national or wipo patent IDs, no? Sj (talk) 16:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Design patents edit

Is this property meant to accept numbers for design patents? Design patents are similar to normal "utility" patents, except that their identifiers contain a 'D' after the country code, at least as is the case for patents from the United States. Currently, the parameter seems to reject 'D' numbers, but I could have been certain that it would not. FreeMediaKid$ 06:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cultivar patent number doesn't fit the regex edit

Here's a patent that I cannot enter on Hydrangea macrophylla 'H2002' (Q113815863) because it doesn't fit the regex: https://patents.google.com/patent/USPP26657P2 If I enter just US26657 that leads to something else entirely. How to fix the property? UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@UWashPrincipalCataloger: Indeed. The admins must allow the regex USPP[0-9]+ for US Plant Patents.--Herrenloses Damenfahrrad (talk) 10:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Return to "P1246" page.