Property talk:P1318
Latest comment: 9 years ago by TomT0m in topic Type of values
Documentation
proved by
person who proved something
person who proved something
Description | country, organization, person which proved (to demonstrate that something is true or viable / to give proof for) sth. usually used as qualifier. | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data type | Item | ||||||||||||
Domain | According to this template:
anything
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statementsproposition (Q108163) | ||||||||||||
Allowed values | country, organization, person (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | ||||||||||||
Example | Pythagorean theorem (Q11518) → Pythagoras (Q10261) four color theorem (Q184410) → Kenneth Appel (Q224787) | ||||||||||||
Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P1318 (Q126375335) | ||||||||||||
See also | theorised by (P8403), discoverer or inventor (P61), solved by (P1136) | ||||||||||||
Lists |
| ||||||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
Search for values |
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “proposition (Q108163)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “proposition (Q108163)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1318#Type Q108163, SPARQL
Value type “human (Q5), collective pseudonym (Q16017119)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value human (Q5), collective pseudonym (Q16017119) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1318#Value type Q5, Q16017119, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1318#Scope, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1318#Entity types
Type of values
edit@Jakec, tomT0m, GZWDer, Micru: when available, can we use this item for the work where the fact was proved rather than the proving person/organization ? Normally, the provers should be the work's authors. For Pythagoras' theorem, I do not know exactly what should be done, as we do not have any work by Pythagoras. Perhaps just "proved by Pythagoras", perhaps, somehow also add the first known work that proved the theorem ? -Zolo (talk) 09:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- I think the first known document that proved the theorem is a good idea, it's very similar to the taxon description in taxonomy, maybe we should reuse the property. To the Pythagora's theorem, I guess we should rely on sources :) There is also the named after property which can make the link.
- By the way, if a theorem have different name in different languages, should not the named after property only be a qualifier of the name ? TomT0m (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- I think "named after" should be used in conjunction with a name string whenever possible. That could be the name as a qualifier of the property rather than the other way round, but it seems less intuitive. So I'd say "named after" always as a qualifier, even though that makes "named afters" harder to query. But I do not think we have any property for names like "Pythagoras' theorem" yet.
- What do you mean with reusing taxon description ? --Zolo (talk) 12:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- I thought there was a property corresponding to first valid description (Q1361864) that linked a species to a document or article that first described the species. I can't find it though, I don't know how they model this. But a property linking any type of scientific concept to the paper that first described it may be a good idea anyway. TomT0m (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)