Property talk:P3014
Latest comment: 2 years ago by So9q in topic Expand to legal concepts?
Documentation
laws applied
the constitutional and statutory provisions that were the primary basis for a decision or law
the constitutional and statutory provisions that were the primary basis for a decision or law
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “legal case (Q2334719), court decision (Q327000), statute (Q820655), law (Q7748), legal act (Q740464), common law (Q30216)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “legal case (Q2334719), court decision (Q327000), statute (Q820655), law (Q7748), legal act (Q740464), common law (Q30216)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3014#Type Q2334719, Q327000, Q820655, Q7748, Q740464, Q30216, SPARQL
Value type “statute (Q820655)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31), subclass of (P279) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value statute (Q820655) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3014#Value type Q820655, SPARQL
Use for legal base? edit
This property is now defined for legal case (Q2334719) but it makes sense to use this property also for referencing to laws for the legal base, see Wikidata:Property proposal/legal base --Hannolans (talk) 11:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Wrong value class constraint edit
law (Q7748) is not a good class for the values of this property as it refers to the academic discipline of law. A better option could be legislation (Q49371), but there is desperate need for clean-up in the class hierarchy there. Belteshassar (talk) 18:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Changed according to above. Belteshassar (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Expand to legal concepts? edit
See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q10660902 @ainali:--So9q (talk) 11:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)