Property talk:P8329

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry in topic Criminal investigations

Documentation

principal investigator
person(s) in charge of conducting a research project
Representsprincipal investigator (Q7245082)
Data typeItem
Domainresearch project (Q1298668), space instrument (Q100349043), space mission (Q2133344), spacecraft (Q40218), research group (Q1241025), witchcraft investigation (Q66458810) or grant (Q230788)
ExampleComparative Effectiveness of Broad- versus Narrow-Spectrum Antibiotics for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Children (Q93379220)Jeffrey S. Gerber (Q38820379)
RV 144 (Q7278028)Supachai Rerks-Ngarm (Q89154809)
See alsoinvestigated by (P1840)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total3,778
Main statement3,75299.3% of uses
Qualifier230.6% of uses
Reference3<0.1% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8329#Type Q1298668, Q100349043, Q2133344, Q40218, Q1241025, Q66458810, Q230788, SPARQL
Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8329#citation needed, hourly updated report
Value type “human (Q5): This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value human (Q5) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8329#Value type Q5, SPARQL

Should this also be used for Co-Principal Investigators? edit

I recently created an entity for a similar role — co-principal investigator (Q106648356). My thinking is that the roles are similar enough (as opposed to a deputy principal investigator (Q105834068)) and that multiple Co-PIs can be added as principal investigator (P8329). Is that the best way to do it, or should they be added as a participant (P710) with the qualifier stating that they are a Co-PI as I did on this entity? Thanks! Aluxosm (talk) 16:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

French label edit

Following this request for comments, the French label now includes the male and the female form. PAC2 (talk) 21:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Criminal investigations edit

Should this also be used for the officer in charge of major police investigations (criminal or non-criminal)? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P8329" page.