(Q24234483)

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Cervical ripening and labor induction with 25 microg vs. 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Vaginally administered misoprostol for outpatient cervical ripening in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

INDUCTION OF LABOUR WITH MISOPROSTOL - A PROSTAGLANDIN E1 ANALOGUE.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol outpatient cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor: a randomized trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 microg dose regimen

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor with misoprostol or oxytocin in Tanzania

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Intravaginal misoprostol vs. dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol vs. oxytocin for induction of labor.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Prostaglandin E2 gel versus misoprostol for cervical ripening in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Extemporaneous preparation of misoprostol gel for cervical ripening: a randomized trial.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Randomized trial in multiparous patients: investigating a single vs. two-dose regimen of intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

No benefit, but increased harm from high dose (100 microg) misoprostol for induction of labour: a randomised trial of high vs. low (50 microg) dose misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with dinoprostone and misoprostol cervical ripening

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening: a prospective, randomized, double-masked trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Randomized controlled trial of 50 and 100 mcg of misoprostol for induction of labor at term

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Uterine and fetal Doppler flow changes after misoprostol and oxytocin therapy for induction of labor in post-term pregnancies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Influence of misoprostol or prostaglandin E(2) for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor in toxemia with misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol and dinoprostone therapy for labor induction: a Doppler comparison of uterine and fetal hemodynamic effects.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor with misoprostol in grand multiparous patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor in great grandmultipara with misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor with 50 and 100 microg of misoprostol: comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for cervical priming prior to induction of labour in term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Vaginal misoprostol as an alternative to oxytocin for induction of labor in women with late fetal death

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Low dose intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Labor induction with vaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha gel.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: a randomized trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

The effect of tablet moistening on labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol: a randomized trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Evaluation of glyceryl trinitrate, misoprostol, and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening in term pregnancy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor: a comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Comparison of induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone in term primigravidae

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Comparative evaluation of 25 μg and 50 μg of intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Shortening the induction delivery interval with prostaglandins: a randomized controlled trial of solo or in combination

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Labour induction with 25 micrograms versus 50 micrograms intravaginal misoprostol in full term pregnancies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Vaginal Misoprostol versus high dose of oxytocin for labor induction: a comparative study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Labour characteristics and uterine activity: misoprostol compared with oxytocin in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Oral misoprostol for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Amniotomy alone for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol induction of labor among women with a history of cesarean delivery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Maternal mortality following the use of misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Oral prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Mifepristone for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Methods for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy: generic protocol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Extra-amniotic prostaglandin for induction of labour.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

In vitro characterization of prostanoid receptors on human myometrium at term pregnancy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

A still birth and uterine rupture during induction of labour with oral misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Intravenous prostaglandin for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Labor induction and meconium: in vitro effects of oxytocin, dinoprostone and misoprostol on rat ileum relative to myometrium

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Buccal or sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Uterine contractility and induction of abortion in early pregnancy by misoprostol and mifepristone

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Homoeopathy for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Acupuncture for induction of labour

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for cervical ripening or induction of labour.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Labor induction with misoprostol

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta-Analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1002%2F14651858.CD000941.PUB2

[The effect of 25 micrograms misoprostol on induction of labor in late pregnancy]

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

A randomized prospective study of misoprostol and dinoproston for induction of labor

1 reference

12 December 2020

A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Medical indications of labor induction: a comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and intravenous prostaglandin E2]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol and congenital malformations

1 reference

12 December 2020

A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol and illegal abortion in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

1 reference

12 December 2020

PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION

1 reference

12 December 2020

A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices

1 reference

12 December 2020

Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Is high-dose misoprostol able to lower the incidence of cesarean section? A randomized controlled trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in the third trimester of pregnancy]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel

1 reference

12 December 2020

Meconium during labour--self-medication and other associations

1 reference

12 December 2020

Effect and risk analysis of misoprostol in stimulating cervical maturity for post-term pregnancy

1 reference

12 December 2020

Prostaglandins in preinduction cervical ripening. Meta-analysis of worldwide clinical experience

1 reference

12 December 2020

Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Outpatient cervical ripening with intravaginal misoprostol

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents

1 reference

12 December 2020

Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy

1 reference

12 December 2020

Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol in term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized study

1 reference

12 December 2020

Corticosteroids for cervical ripening and induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol and induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol as a labor induction agent

1 reference

12 December 2020

Labour characteristics and uterine activity: misoprostol compared with oxytocin in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes

1 reference

12 December 2020

Cervical priming with oral misoprostol in pre-labor rupture of membranes at term

1 reference

12 December 2020

Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents

1 reference

12 December 2020

Relaxin for cervical ripening and induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Hyaluronidase for cervical ripening and induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Uterine hyperstimulation. The need for standard terminology.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital

1 reference

12 December 2020

A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening

1 reference

12 December 2020

Retention of dinoprostone vaginal insert beyond 12 hours for induction of labor

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour in women with prolonged pregnancy--safety and effectiveness comparison

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Clinical observation of misoprostol on induction in late pregnancy]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Uterine rupture during preinduction cervical ripening with misoprostol in a patient with a previous Caesarean delivery

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Comparison of misoprostol and ricinus oil meal for cervical ripening and labor induction]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparative cost analysis of prostaglandin analogues dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of misoprostol and prostaglandin E(2) in the preinduction and induction of labor.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol to induce labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Efficacy of dinoprostone, intracervical foleys and misoprostol in labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

Outpatient misoprostol cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor to prevent post-term pregnancy

1 reference

12 December 2020

Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent

1 reference

12 December 2020

Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores

1 reference

12 December 2020

A randomized trial of misoprostol and oxytocin for induction of labor: safety and efficacy

1 reference

12 December 2020

Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison

1 reference

12 December 2020

Uterine rupture associated with vaginal birth after cesarean section: a complication of intravaginal misoprostol?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized Controlled Trial of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intracervical Prostaglandin E2 Gel for Induction of Labor at Term

1 reference

12 December 2020

Sexual intercourse for cervical ripening and induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Cervical ripening in the third trimester of pregnancy with intravaginal misoprostol: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction: a randomised controlled trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Urinary nitric oxide metabolite changes in spontaneous and induced onset active labor

1 reference

12 December 2020

Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix

1 reference

12 December 2020

Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol versus expectant management in premature rupture of membranes at term

1 reference

12 December 2020

A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor

1 reference

12 December 2020

A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol for cervical ripening at and near term--a comparative study.

1 reference

12 December 2020

A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Tocographic pattern induced by misoprostol

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomised trial of one versus two doses of prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: 1. Clinical outcome

1 reference

12 December 2020

A comparative trial of labor induction with misoprostol versus oxytocin

1 reference

12 December 2020

Intravaginal misoprostol in preterm premature rupture of membranes with low Bishop scores

1 reference

12 December 2020

Mechanical methods for induction of labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Evaluation of postpartum blood loss after misoprostol-induced labour

1 reference

12 December 2020

Safety and efficacy of misoprostol and dinoprostone as cervical ripening agents

1 reference

12 December 2020

Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section

1 reference

12 December 2020

Cytotec: an effective drug for the induction of labor

1 reference

12 December 2020

A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor

1 reference

12 December 2020

Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction

1 reference

12 December 2020

A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening

1 reference

12 December 2020

Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Randomized comparative study of induced labor with oxytocin and misoprostol in prolonged pregnancies]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol--a PGE1 analog for induction of labor at term: comparative and randomized study with oxytocin

1 reference

12 December 2020

Preinduction cervical ripening with intravaginal prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Efficacy and safety of misoprostol in induction of labour in a Nigerian tertiary hospital

1 reference

12 December 2020

Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Labor induction at term: a comparison of the effects of 50 microg and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Using of Misoprostol for preinduction and induction of labor in term pregnancy]

1 reference

12 December 2020

A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term

1 reference

12 December 2020

Uterine rupture and dehiscence associated with intravaginal misoprostol cervical ripening

1 reference

12 December 2020

Uterine hyperstimulation after low-dose prostaglandin E2 therapy: tocolytic treatment in 181 cases

1 reference

12 December 2020

Misoprostol and oxytocin for induction of cervical ripening and labor in patients with term pregnancy and premature membrane rupture

1 reference

12 December 2020

Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Use of misoprostol for labor induction in stillbirth]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Urinary cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate changes in spontaneous and induced onset active labor

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1002/14651858.CD000941.PUB2

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

Fatcat

https://api.fatcat.wiki/v0/release/dmbdrpgo3fczxcymnfnknw6ouq

30 July 2022

mapped directly with Wikidata item

Fatcat ID

release_dmbdrpgo3fczxcymnfnknw6ouq

1 reference

Fatcat

https://api.fatcat.wiki/v0/release/dmbdrpgo3fczxcymnfnknw6ouq

30 July 2022

mapped directly with Wikidata item

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1220790

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1220790

PMC publication ID

7061246

0 references

PubMed publication ID

1 reference

https://api.fatcat.wiki/v0/release/dmbdrpgo3fczxcymnfnknw6ouq

30 July 2022