(Q24273351)

25 June 2017

1 reference

title

Emerging trends in peer review-a survey (English)

1 reference

25 June 2017

0 references

Richard Walker

1

1 reference

25 June 2017

Pascal Rocha da Silva

series ordinal

2

1 reference

25 June 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

27 May 2015

1 reference

Frontiers in Neuroscience

25 June 2017

1 reference

25 June 2017

9

1 reference

25 June 2017

169

1 reference

Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure

25 June 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Why most published research findings are false

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

The history of the peer-review process

19 March 2017

2 references

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

19 March 2017

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again

19 March 2017

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389/FNINS.2015.00169

Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

22 April 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Personal attributes of authors and reviewers, social bias and the outcomes of peer review: a case study

7 April 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Stimulus-triggered fate conversion of somatic cells into pluripotency

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

The eLife approach to peer review

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

The ups and downs of peer review

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Gender factors in reviewer recommendations for manuscript publication

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

The evolution of editorial peer review

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4444765

Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation

27 September 2017

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Pernicious publication practices

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Journals weigh up double-blind peer review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

IS PEER REVIEW IN DECLINE?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

The changing face of peer review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Language bias discredits the peer-review system.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Reviving a culture of scientific debate

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

21 January 2018

Peer review and fraud

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Testing the rebound peer review concept

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

The journal as an overlay on preprint databases

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Company offers portable peer review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Does double-blind review benefit female authors?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Gender bias in the refereeing process?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.3389%2FFNINS.2015.00169

Pros and cons of open peer review

21 January 2018

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26074753

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors?

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26074753

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.3389/FNINS.2015.00169

1 reference

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

25 June 2017

1771579

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1 reference

Consolidated OpenCitations Corpus – April 2017

OpenCitations bibliographic resource ID

1 reference