(Q24288795)

English

Grant application review: the case of transparency

scientific article

In more languages

edit

Statements

instance of

scholarly article

0 references

title

Grant application review: the case of transparency (English)

0 references

Thomas Koenig

3

0 references

Elena Milanesi

object named as

Elena Milanesi

series ordinal

2

0 references

David Gurwitz

series ordinal

1

object named as

David Gurwitz

0 references

reviewed by

Daniel Mietchen

0 references

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

December 2014

0 references

published in

PLOS Biology

0 references

volume

12

0 references

page(s)

e1002010

0 references

issue

12

0 references

copyright license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

start time

2 December 2014

1 reference

stated in

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

copyright status

copyrighted

0 references

cites work

More time for research: Fund people not projects

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

19 March 2017

Peer reviews: make them public

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

19 March 2017

Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

19 March 2017

Open review system: The new trend in scientific reviewing to improve transparency and overcome biasness

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

19 March 2017

UK research funding bodies' views towards public participation in health-related research decisions: an exploratory study

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

19 March 2017

Ten simple rules for cultivating open science and collaborative R&D;

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

19 March 2017

On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

19 March 2017

Heterogeneity of inter-rater reliabilities of grant peer reviews and its determinants: a general estimating equations approach

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

27 September 2017

Peer review of grant applications: criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

27 September 2017

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

27 September 2017

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

30 May 2018

Open engagement: exploring public participation in the biosciences.

1 reference

stated in

PubMed Central

reference URL

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4251823

retrieved

30 May 2018

Science funding. NSF's 'Big Pitch' tests anonymized grant reviews

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PBIO.1002010

retrieved

21 January 2018

Peering into peer review

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PBIO.1002010

retrieved

21 January 2018

Improving ERC ethical standards

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PBIO.1002010

retrieved

21 January 2018

The Matthew Effect in Science

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PBIO.1002010

retrieved

21 January 2018

Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network.

1 reference

stated in

Crossref

reference URL

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PBIO.1002010

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25460001

retrieved

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

Identifiers

DOI

10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1002010

0 references

0 references

0 references

ResearchGate publication ID

269180469

0 references

(Q24288795)

Grant application review: the case of transparency

Statements

Identifiers

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)