(Q34430726)

2 August 2017

title

Peer review of grant applications: criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices (English)

1 reference

2 August 2017

1 reference

Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

6

object named as

Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

0 references

author name string

Hendy Abdoul

1

1 reference

2 August 2017

Christophe Perrey

2

1 reference

2 August 2017

Philippe Amiel

3

1 reference

2 August 2017

Florence Tubach

4

1 reference

2 August 2017

Serge Gottot

5

1 reference

2 August 2017

Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

6

1 reference

2 August 2017

Corinne Alberti

7

1 reference

2 August 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

28 September 2012

1 reference

2 August 2017

1 reference

2 August 2017

volume

7

1 reference

2 August 2017

issue

9

1 reference

2 August 2017

page(s)

e46054

1 reference

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

2 August 2017

copyright license

start time

28 September 2012

1 reference

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

copyright status

copyrighted

0 references

cites work

Non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in France

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Subjective judgements in scientific practice and art.

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

The Delphi process: a solution for reviewing novel grant applications

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Training of peer reviewers: validation of a 5-point rating scale

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Outcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Agreement between experts: an answer, but is it the answer for you?

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Outcomes from NHMRC public health research project grants awarded in 1993.

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

The peer review process: the art of judgment

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

The reliability of peer assessments. A meta-analysis

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Improving participation and interrater agreement in scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association abstracts. How well have we succeeded?

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Judging clinical research questions: what criteria are used?

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

A statistical model validating triage for the peer review process: keeping the competitive applications in the review pipeline

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Evaluation of cardiovascular grant-in-aid applications by peer review: influence of internal and external reviewers and committees.

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Quality review in the Peer Review Organization Program

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

Agreement among reviewers of review articles

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3460995

CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials

6 July 2018

1 reference

PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23029386

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0046054

1 reference

2 August 2017

0 references

1 reference

2 August 2017

1 reference