Home
Random
Nearby
Log in
Settings
Donate
About Wikidata
Disclaimers
Search
(Q36689712)
Watch
English
Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey
scientific article published on January 2007
In more languages
edit
Statements
instance of
scholarly article
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
title
Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey
(English)
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
main subject
peer review
1 reference
based on heuristic
inferred from title
author
Sara Schroter
object named as
Sara Schroter
series ordinal
2
0 references
author name string
Leanne Tite
series ordinal
1
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
language of work or name
English
1 reference
based on heuristic
inferred from title
publication date
1 January 2007
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
published in
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
volume
61
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
issue
1
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
page(s)
9-12
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
cites work
Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial
1 reference
stated in
PubMed Central
reference URL
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2465595
retrieved
30 September 2017
Identifying manuscript reviewers: randomized comparison of asking first or just sending
1 reference
stated in
PubMed Central
reference URL
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2465595
retrieved
30 September 2017
Prodding tardy reviewers: a randomized comparison of telephone, fax, and e-mail
1 reference
stated in
PubMed Central
reference URL
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2465595
retrieved
30 September 2017
Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: two randomized trials
1 reference
stated in
PubMed Central
reference URL
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2465595
retrieved
30 September 2017
Peer review: reform or revolution?
1 reference
stated in
PubMed Central
reference URL
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2465595
retrieved
30 September 2017
Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensable
1 reference
stated in
PubMed Central
reference URL
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2465595
retrieved
30 September 2017
Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance.
1 reference
stated in
PubMed Central
reference URL
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=2465595
retrieved
28 June 2018
Identifiers
DOI
10.1136/JECH.2006.049817
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
PMCID
2465595
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
PubMed ID
17183008
1 reference
stated in
Europe PubMed Central
PMCID
2465595
retrieved
15 August 2017
ResearchGate publication ID
6617437
0 references
Sitelinks
Wikipedia
(0 entries)
edit
Wikibooks
(0 entries)
edit
Wikinews
(0 entries)
edit
Wikiquote
(0 entries)
edit
Wikisource
(0 entries)
edit
Wikiversity
(0 entries)
edit
Wikivoyage
(0 entries)
edit
Wiktionary
(0 entries)
edit
Multilingual sites
(0 entries)
edit
