(Q34230558)

31 July 2017

title

Non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in France (English)

1 reference

31 July 2017

author

Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

5

object named as

Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

0 references

Philippe Amiel

object named as

Philippe Amiel

4

0 references

author name string

Hendy Abdoul

1

1 reference

31 July 2017

Christophe Perrey

2

1 reference

31 July 2017

Florence Tubach

3

1 reference

31 July 2017

Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

5

1 reference

31 July 2017

Corinne Alberti

6

1 reference

31 July 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

9 April 2012

1 reference

31 July 2017

1 reference

31 July 2017

volume

7

1 reference

31 July 2017

issue

4

1 reference

31 July 2017

page(s)

e35247

1 reference

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

31 July 2017

copyright license

start time

9 April 2012

1 reference

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

copyright status

copyrighted

0 references

cites work

Is open peer review the fairest system? No.

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes.

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Requirements and definitions in conflict of interest policies of medical journals

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Financial and intellectual conflicts of interest: confusion and clarity

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Decisional conflict among patients who accept or decline participation in phase I oncology studies

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

National Cancer Institute's Small Grants Program for behavioral research in cancer control boosts careers for new investigators and fulfills NIH research priorities

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Improving grant application peer review for the NIEHS.

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

The limits of competing interest disclosures

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Financial interest and its disclosure in scientific publications

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Evaluation of cardiovascular grant-in-aid applications by peer review: influence of internal and external reviewers and committees.

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Grant application and review procedures of the National Institute of Handicapped Research: survey of applicant and peer reviewer opinions

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

U.S. budget. House 'peer review' kills two NIH grants.

6 July 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035247

Experts deny claims that peer review system is in crisis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035247

Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035247

Improving peer review: who's responsible?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0035247

Making sense of non-financial competing interests

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3322153

Italy. A plea for 'transparent' funding

28 October 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Peer review. Australia's proposed U.K.-style merit ranking stirs debate

1 reference

12 December 2020

Research grants and acknowledgment of funding of published studies

1 reference

12 December 2020

Grants management. NSF survey of applicants finds a system teetering on the brink

1 reference

12 December 2020

Beyond conflict of interest. Non-financial conflicts of interest are more serious than financial conflicts

1 reference

12 December 2020

Nonfinancial conflicts of interest in research

1 reference

12 December 2020

Grants awarded on the basis of political criteria

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0035247

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

31 July 2017

0 references

1 reference

31 July 2017

1 reference