(Q30830681)

11 November 2017

Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial (English)

1 reference

11 November 2017

0 references

randomized experiment

1 reference

Erik Cobo

1

0 references

Albert Selva-O'Callaghan

1 reference

ORCID Public Data File 2021

Francesc Cardellach

4

object named as

Francesc Cardellach

1 reference

11 November 2017

Albert Selva-O'Callagham

2

1 reference

11 November 2017

Josep-Maria Ribera

3

1 reference

11 November 2017

Ruth Dominguez

5

1 reference

11 November 2017

Miquel Vilardell

6

1 reference

11 November 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

28 March 2007

1 reference

11 November 2017

1 reference

11 November 2017

2

1 reference

11 November 2017

3

1 reference

11 November 2017

e332

1 reference

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

11 November 2017

start time

28 March 2007

1 reference

April 2022 Public Data File from Crossref

copyright status

copyrighted

0 references

uses

randomized experiment

0 references

cites work

From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005.

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Research funding: peer review at NIH.

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Impact of blinded versus unblinded abstract review on scientific program content

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: two randomized trials

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

The Lancet's statistical review process: areas for improvement by authors

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Suspended judgment. Editorial peer review: let us put it on trial

21 June 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=1824709

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

21 June 2018

1 reference

Crossref

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0000332

Commentary: The ‘bibliographic impact factor’ and the still uncharted sociology of epidemiology

21 January 2018

1 reference

Crossref

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1371%2FJOURNAL.PONE.0000332

Does editorial peer review work?

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Peer review in action: the contribution of referees to advancing reliable knowledge

1 reference

12 December 2020

[How to improve the statistical quality of articles presented to biomedical journals: a checklist for authors]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?

1 reference

12 December 2020

Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement

1 reference

12 December 2020

[Abridged checklist for the evaluation of basic biomedical research papers]

1 reference

12 December 2020

Peering into the review process

1 reference

12 December 2020

Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizado

1 reference

12 December 2020

Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0000332

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

11 November 2017

0 references

1 reference

11 November 2017

PubMed publication ID

17389922

1 reference