(Q37959692)

English

Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial

scientific article

In more languages

Statements

scholarly article

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (English)

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

1 reference

based on heuristic

inferred from title

Lourdes Cirugeda

object named as

L Cirugeda

8

0 references

object named as

J Cortés

2

0 references

author name string

E Cobo

1

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

J M Ribera

3

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

F Cardellach

4

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

A Selva-O'Callaghan

5

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

B Kostov

6

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

L García

7

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

D G Altman

9

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

J A González

10

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

J A Sànchez

11

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

F Miras

12

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

A Urrutia

13

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

V Fonollosa

14

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

C Rey-Joly

15

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

M Vilardell

16

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

language of work or name

0 references

publication date

22 November 2011

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

343

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

d6783

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Epidemiology, public health, and the rhetoric of false positives

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Why current publication practices may distort science

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: a plea for epistemological modesty

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

The scandal of poor medical research

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

Suspended judgment. Editorial peer review: let us put it on trial

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

6 September 2017

The scandal of poor epidemiological research

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

23 June 2018

Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

1 September 2018

Peer review and fraud

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=3222149

3 December 2018

Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement

1 reference

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22108262

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizado

1 reference

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22108262

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

Peer review of scientific papers--a never-ending conundrum

1 reference

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22108262

12 December 2020

based on heuristic

inferred from PubMed ID database lookup

Identifiers

10.1136/BMJ.D6783

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

1 reference

Europe PubMed Central

25 August 2017

ResearchGate publication ID

0 references

Sitelinks

Wikipedia(0 entries)

Wikibooks(0 entries)

Wikinews(0 entries)

Wikiquote(0 entries)

Wikisource(0 entries)

Wikiversity(0 entries)

Wikivoyage(0 entries)

Wiktionary(0 entries)

Multilingual sites(0 entries)

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q37959692&oldid=2088657388"