(Q48411915)

11 February 2018

title

How can empirical ethics improve medical practice? (English)

1 reference

11 February 2018

0 references

1

Reidun Førde

1 reference

11 February 2018

publication date

1 October 2012

1 reference

11 February 2018

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

published in

1 reference

11 February 2018

volume

21

1 reference

11 February 2018

issue

4

1 reference

11 February 2018

page(s)

517-526

1 reference

11 February 2018

Male physicians' narratives about being in ethically difficult care situations in paediatrics.

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Value choices and considerations when limiting intensive care treatment: a qualitative study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Use and abuse of empirical knowledge in contemporary bioethics

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Clinical ethics committees in Norway: what do they do, and does it make a difference?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Barriers and challenges in clinical ethics consultations: the experiences of nine clinical ethics committees

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

What does empirical research contribute to medical ethics? A methodological discussion using exemplary studies

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Evaluating clinical ethics consultation: a European perspective.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Research on clinical ethics and consultation. Introduction to the theme

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Psychosocial problems arising from home ventilation.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Clinicians' evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors' personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Fair nursing care when resources are limited: the role of patients and family members in Norwegian home-based services

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Moral distress among Norwegian doctors

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Living with conflicts-ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Ethical challenges in the provision of end-of-life care in Norwegian nursing homes.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Ethical decision-making in nursing homes: influence of organizational factors

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Choice is not the issue. The misrepresentation of healthcare in bioethical discourse

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Hydration management at the end of life

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Enteral tube feeding in older people with advanced dementia: findings from a Cochrane systematic review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

Being the lifeline: The parent experience of caring for a child with neuromuscular disease on home mechanical ventilation

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

7 January 2021

Patient involvement in decisions to limit treatment: the crucial role of agreement between physician and patient

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

7 January 2021

Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990-1995.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

7 January 2021

Artificial nutrition and hydration in the last week of life in cancer patients. A systematic literature review of practices and effects

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

7 January 2021

Life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes: how do physicians and nurses describe and justify their own practice?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

7 January 2021

Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? "The embedded researcher" as a methodological approach

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1017%2FS096318011200028X

7 January 2021

10.1017/S096318011200028X

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

11 February 2018

1 reference

11 February 2018