Talk:Q1348305
Latest comment: 6 years ago by GerardM in topic How should we use this item for scientific articles?
Autodescription — erratum (Q1348305)
description: published correction to a previous publication
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “erratum” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- erratum (Q1348305)
- publication (Q732577)
- correction (Q1414531)
- written work (Q47461344)
- declarative sentence (Q474328)
- erratum (Q1348305)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
erratum⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
How should we use this item for scientific articles?
editWhen we stumble on a scientific article that is an erratum (Q1348305), e.g., Erratum to: Depicted serving size: cereal packaging pictures exaggerate serving sizes and promote overserving (Q42315459), then how should we tag it? With instance of (P31) or genre (P136) or something else. (Note there is also corrigendum / erratum (P2507) which can be used for the item describing the corrected article). — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 13:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The Source MetaData WikiProject does not exist. Please correct the name.
- How about retracted papers.. They are even more noxious. Thanks, GerardM (talk) 15:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)