Talk:Q1969448
Autodescription — term (Q1969448)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “term” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
term⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
This item is suggested as allowed value for property P107. Discuss at Property talk:P107. Mange01 (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation?
editw:en:Term is a disambiguation page. Is it okay? --fryed-peach (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
концепция?
editПочему "концепция"? На http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2618625 странно смотрится как значение "[Property:P107|тип элемента]", да и на самой странице "тип элемента" сказано, что одно из допустимых значений - "термин". Но - пишешь "термин", получаешь "концепция".. Это же не одно и то же! --Nashev (talk) 16:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Q151885: Begreb=Begreb? Begriff=Begriff (philosophie)? Concept=?
editWe have also Q151885. In Danish Q1969448 and Q151885 it is the same word (begreb). The same goes for Swedish. In German there is a "Redundanzdiskussion" between Begriff and Begriff (Philosophie). In English there is only "Concept". Some languages have Term* and Concep*/Konsep*. There seems to me to be some haze in the Wikidata concept of the terms concept and term. — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 15:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
difference from Q151885?
editMost concepts are not instances of terms
editPeople seem to confuse concepts with terms, and as a result, many Wikidata concepts are tracked as instances of "term". That is incorrect. E.g. interstellar medium (Q41872) is tracked as instance of term, but that is not so: the name of the concept is an instance of term, while the concept is not. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)