Talk:Q213051
Autodescription — non-fiction (Q213051)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “non-fiction” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
non-fiction⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Merge non-fiction literature (Q27801)? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I suppose scientific literature belongs here but not there. --Infovarius (talk) 23:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Also, non fiction refers to more than just literature. For instance, documentary (Q4164344) Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 03:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Modifications for the French wiki edit
Hello,
I don't know why Q213051 and Q27801 are both protected but here is a suggested switch for the French language: put fr:Littérature non-fictionnelle as Q27801 and fr:Non-fiction as Q213051. You'll need to temporally cancel the redirection from Littérature non-fictionnelle to Non-fiction on the French wiki to do this, of course.
Thanks in advance, Charlestpt (talk) 07:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Russian term edit
Wiktionary says, it should be with a dash, нон-фикшен.
Merge with non-fiction work (Q20540385)? edit
I'm having a lot of trouble understanding the intended distinction between this and non-fiction work (Q20540385). This is currently a superclass of non-fiction work (Q20540385), with non-fiction work (Q20540385) having the additional superclasses literary work (Q7725634) and publication (Q732577), which might suggest that non-fictional works that aren't made available to the public or aren't created for "aesthetic or recreative purposes" would fall under non-fiction (Q213051) but not non-fiction work (Q20540385) -- but in that case, we need a much clearer English language label for it, as the current one doesn't suggest these constraints at all. JesseW (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)