In https://quickstatements.toolforge.org/#/batch/82614 you seem to have introduced some errors like on canvas (Q4259259) & sheep (Q7368). Please respond. You seem to have some problem responding to requests. I will blocked your account from editing the main namespace and I'll consider unblocking it after you responded to these issues.
Topic on User talk:Matlin
I understand, I'll write back, but it will take some time. I have to collect all contested editions and analyze them. So far, I've been taking a little break from Wikidata.
There is so much that I could write here, I am not sure that I do this in this opinion.
In this situation, we need to determine which entries are correct, because the rest must be removed from the MnM. I did not add information about the origin of the MnM entries in the title of the batch, so you may not have known about the source of these statements. I have listed some in the table, marking the appropriate notes.
I do not want to deny responsibility for these editions, but I am not the only "guilty", perhaps more damage is done by the person who reverts edits in WD, but not in MnM (even if not everyone uses MnM), especially if the wrong match is at least several years old.
I think it is a serious thing. It was only a few months ago that I realized that reverting the edition in WD does not revert the edition in MnM. Before, I did not try to remove (all) undone edits in MnM, and this could affect many users.
If I had access to WD, I would like to review my serial editions, compare them (I have already done so, for example https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q7944&oldid=1572871818), but with the access only for MnM is frustrating.
I have already started some of the discussions on my talk page, I undertake to resolve the others, because so far I have not found a case that would not have my will to fix, apart from the case of VIAF clusters (I agree with it to a large extent, but it concerns very few cases and editions other users indicate a low risk; see my other discussions).
For a long time, I came to other useful conclusions. I will definitely check my series better, since so many users indicate errors, but I must have a possibility to correct it alone, not waiting in an item talk page like one of the users.
+1. See also this wrong import and the comment by User:Wurgl.
I corrected the wrong entry attributed to me to point to culture of the Song Dynasty (Q3007470), made sure that has the AAT id, and added that is a "facet of: Song Dynasty". When I made that match, culture of the Song Dynasty (Q3007470) did not exist, so I matched to the closest thing available. Cheers!
As you are back and responding to topics, I removed the main namespace block. This is by no means an invitation to start mass editing again. Please address the different issues, be more careful in the future and be more responsive.
Also a reminder: You are responsible for your edits. If someone else made an incorrect match in Mix'n'Match and you imported it, you are responsible for that edit. Don't ever try to shift the blame to someone else.