Denelson83

Re: Q169523

Sorry that I didn't see that you wanted to edit this entity. I put an {{Ep}} template to add this page into relevant category. Stang 08:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Denelson83 (talk) 08:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Chomedey

Bonjour, si tu ne veux pas tout casser, ajoute une nature au lieu de la substituer par un autre[1]. Si certains considère Chomedey comme un secteur, il est aussi identifié comme un quartier. Ta modification fait que ce quartier a disparu de la carte interactive de la Géographie de Laval. Merci. Yanik ^B 23:43, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

C'est parce que Chomedey n'est pas identifié comme un quartier par la Base de données toponymiques du Canada, seulement comme un secteur. Je prepare tous ces lieux pour accepter la proprieté P821. -- Denelson83 (talk) 23:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Ce n'est pas parce qu'une source dit une chose que les autres ne sont pas bonnes. Lorsqu'il y a un doute, on ajoute une nature, c'est simple et ça évite les impaires. --Yanik ^B 23:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Je comprends. -- Denelson83 (talk) 23:56, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Hum

Bonjour encore, je vois cette modification [2] et celle-ci [3]. Maintenant comment fait on pour avoir la liste des rivières du bassin versant de la rivière Nottaway[4] ? Yanik ^B 23:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

N'est-ce pas à cela que sert la propriété P403 ? J'ai changé cette valeur P31 pour l'harmoniser avec d'autres éléments que j'ai trouvés provenant de la Base de données toponymiques du Canada. -- Denelson83 (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Le problème avec P403 est que si un cours d'eau se jette dans un lac on perd le fil du cours (P403*), les lacs n'ont pas de P403 mais un P201, c'est pourquoi on utilise P4614* pour sélectionner les cours d'eau d'un bassin versant. Note que la CTQ spécifie le type d'entité. As-tu fait beaucoup de ces suppressions de nature ? --Yanik ^B 14:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Oui, j'ai changé le P31 pour tous les ruisseaux dans la BDTC, mais seulement si le P31 n'etait pas déjà référencée. C'etait afin que je pouvrais les trouver plus facile. Je traque ces toponymes dans un tableur, ce que je publierai après finir ajouter tous les clés cinq-lettre restant de la BDTC pour le Québec à Wikidata, afin que les toponymes peuvent être maintenus sur Wikidata comme un bloc. -- Denelson83 (talk) 17:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

J'ai remarqué qu'il y avait confusion entre ruisseau (brook (Q63565252)) et courant d'eau (stream (Q47521)) chez les anglophones. Il en reste plus de 500 à vérifier[5]. --Yanik ^B 18:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

C'est vrai que les traductions entre n'importe quels deux langues ne sont jamais parfaites. Je, pour un, ne parle pas couramment le Français. -- Denelson83 (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Comment

Hi, it's me again. Notice that James Bay empties in Hudson Bay, not the other way around[6]

P.S. I got a hard time restoring the rivers and the brooks you’ve altered. Yanik ^B 16:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

That's weird. Why did I say Hudson Bay empties into James Bay?

Here's a link to a spreadsheet that might help you. -- Denelson83 (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Do you still have the spreadsheet you used for Quebec's watercourses ? --Yanik ^B 17:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

That is the spreadsheet. Scroll down until you see "Stream" in the "Generic Term" column, and look for entries with Q-values of less than 110 million. -- Denelson83 (talk) 19:55, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Sadly, I have to analyze manualy each modification to put back the right type of stream. As a stream can be a river, a canal, a channel, a brook, a creek ... Can you explain to me why it was necessary to put the generic item rather than keep the specific item? --Yanik ^B 12:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

It is because Q355304 is the predominant P31 in use for that type of item, and it did not seem to make sense to me to use other P31 values that what seemed to me to lack any rhyme or reason. -- Denelson83 (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Well, I often see "Quebec" for P131 on items but I won't change to Q176 all P131 that have a spécific location, see what I meen ? --Yanik ^B 13:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Because P131=Q176 is used at least an order of magnitude more than P31=Q355304 within Quebec. -- Denelson83 (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

The point is that specific values should not be substituted by generic values. "Stream" is a generic value and "River" is a specific value. Hopefully in the future you will be aware of the difference. --Yanik ^B 15:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Canadian villages

Hi. You set village (Q532) as a subclass of census subdivision (Q17457753) (Special:Diff/1808868351). I think this wasn't a good idea and should be undone. You used "country: Canada" qualifier but despite that basically villages of all other countries too are currently classified as census geographic units of Canada, and also e.g. as administrative territorial entities as indicated by parent classes of Q17457753. I noticed this as some non-administrative entities used as P131 value no longer yield a constraint violation due to your change. As you can see Q532 doesn't have other country specific statements. If necessary then new class item for Canadian type of settlement and/or municipality can be created, similar to e.g. village in the United States (Q751708). 2001:7D0:81DB:1480:CCC0:D1F1:BB6C:6C77 17:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

You now changed qualifer to "applies to jurisdiction: Canada" but I don't think this makes much difference. When people use this item for classification purposes or when they run queries then they are not supposed to know that such qualifier exists and that some results should be filtered out accordingly. I still think this Canada-specific parent class should be removed from general village class. 2001:7D0:81DB:1480:A8B5:DDF2:B3EB:1E12 06:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Q22425636

Hi, I dont mind the merging of Lac Fleur-de-May (Q22425636), but you should at least transform the cebwiki article in a redirect [7], or the item will be recreated one day. Fralambert (talk) 00:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Confusion

Bonjour,

Attention, il y avait une confusion entre un poème et un lieu sur Q19182790. Je viens de corrigeant en revenant à l'état avant confusion et en créant un autre élément pour le lieu : La Cuve (Q122749733). Normalement (si je n'ai pas fait d'erreurs), cela devrait être bon maintenant.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:26, 21 September 2023 (UTC)