Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Tommy Kronkvist/Flow Archive 1 on 2016-05-10.

Feel free to write me a note below, but since I'm mostly active on the English (talk) and Swedish (talk) Wikipedia you will probably get the quickest response if you leave me a message on any of my user talk pages on those sites.

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction surveyEdit

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)


Like some other community members, you have tried Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 12:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

nameGuzzler scriptsEdit

You'll probably find the nameGuzzler script, for mass changing an item's labels, useful. See User:Pigsonthewing/Setup#Scripts. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

@Pigsonthewing: I actually added it to my "commons.js" last November together with a few other scripts, but had forgotten about the particular nameGuzzler script. Thanks for the reminder. –Tommy Kronkvist, 02:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC).

[lb] descriptionsEdit


you did some (or a lot) wrong descriptions for lb. Can you please undo. Thanks in advance. --Les Meloures (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I see your new changes are not better. I tkink you don't know anything about luxemburgish, so why do you try to make descriptions in a language you don't understand??? --Les Meloures (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello @Les Meloures, and thank you for your remarks. As you said I'm going through my edits at the moment. Unfortunately the Wikidata "Search" function isn't particularly fine-grained so it will take some time, even though only 100 or so of my tens of thousands of Wikidata edits have anything to do with Luxembourgish.
Most of my [lb] edits only regards changing an empty value to include a single word like for example "Botaniker" or "Zoolog", and they are easy since they don't need to be corrected. The others I will revert. As for the very most recent of my edits that you refer to above, they have now all been reverted by me, or corrected by you. Please give me an hour or two and all of my erroneous [lb] edits will have been corrected (or reverted). Best regards, Tommy Kronkvist, 18:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC).
Thank you for the work you do and best greatings. --Les Meloures (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
  Done. It took a bit longer than excepted since I had make a detour into Wikispecies in order to do some admin- and bureaucrat related work, but as far as I know the above issues are now all fixed. –Tommy Kronkvist, 21:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC).

Good morning,

How has it been collaboratively contributing to Wikipedia and its sister projects?

I would really appreciate your views on the Anyone for Everyone program.

Anyone for Everyone is a campaign to encourage and guide internet users to contribute more to Wikimedia projects. The campaign aims to encourage 19 actions/activities that anyone could do on Wikimedia projects (Commons, Wikidata, Wikibooks etc.) for the benefit of everyone. Can you help expand the list by adding bullet points?

Thanks for weaving the lines and letters that make information neutrally open to the world.

Danidamiobi (talk) 23:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

New page for cataloguesEdit

Hi, I created a new page for collecting sites that could be added to Mix'n'match and I plan to expand it with the ones that already have scrapers by category. Feel free to expand, use for property creation. Best, --Adam Harangozó (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks @Adam Harangozó. It looks both useful and promising. Regards, Tommy Kronkvist, 19:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC).