Wikidata:Properties for deletion/P6656

P6656 (P6656)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Consensus to delete — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P6656 (P6656): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Replaced by BHCL UUID (P9037). P6656 only redirects to the IDs of BHCL UUID (P9037) —Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notified participants of WikiProject Czech Republic Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 12:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Replacement is better.--Jklamo (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a bit odd that it get listed for deletion shortly after P9037 was added. Does that mean that it wasn't really of much use in general? So if this is deleted, maybe P9037 should be as well. --- Jura 12:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jura1 Why is that odd? P9037 is a replacement for P6656. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 13:46, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Some think that identifiers should be added to Wikidata so that others can reconcile datasets they have with Wikidata. --- Jura 08:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. @Jura1: Do you claim that P6656 (P6656) values are already used in a bunch of other databases? @Vojtěch Dostál: please comment --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 10:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am not aware of a database which uses hard-coded links with the old identifier values. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 12:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- If it was added to Wikidata, it should have a use beyond merely providing links. --- Jura 13:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Implementation notes

Question: @Vojtěch Dostál: do you know if all 36,546 statements with this property been migrated to BHCL UUID (P9037)? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
According to Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P6656#Item_P9037 there are three but I've checked them and they are not valid — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MSGJ All seem to be migrated, thanks for fixing the three. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 05:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Removing statements — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]