Wikidata:Property proposal/Commons-Kategorie für Portraits
category for portraits of the person edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
Description | Commons category for media files depicting portraits of this person |
---|---|
Represents | portrait (Q134307), Commons category (Q24574745) |
Data type | Item |
Example 1 | Pierre Jeanneret (Q115575) → Category:Portraits of Pierre Jeanneret (Q106394463) |
Example 2 | Le Corbusier (Q4724) → Category:Portraits of Le Corbusier (Q106394443) |
Example 3 | Alexander the Great (Q8409) → Category:Portraits of Alexander the Great (Q106394482) |
Example 4 | Henry Moore (Q151097) → Category:Portraits of Henry Moore (Q106394495) |
See also | Commons category (P373), category for the interior of the item (P7561), category for the exterior of the item (P8596) |
Motivation edit
There exists on commons often for wellknown persons a separate subdirectory with portraits. It would be nice to have a special property therefore (beside of the general Commons category (P373)). Arch2all (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- Support. I guess it's OK. Thierry Caro (talk) 22:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. No, we already too many of these properties. Multichill (talk) 17:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. This is why related category (P7084) was created. Use related category (P7084) with qualifier of (P642) = portrait (Q134307); and also category combines topics (P971) on the category item, with appropriate values. Jheald (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- I added a related category (P7084) entry for the example Le Corbusier (Q4724) as You suggested, but I really believe portrait categories for persons are such a common usecase, that a special property (without the need for a qualifier) makes sense. --Arch2all (talk) 09:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Aren't portraits usually by year? --- Jura 11:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- I added a related category (P7084) entry for the example Le Corbusier (Q4724) as You suggested, but I really believe portrait categories for persons are such a common usecase, that a special property (without the need for a qualifier) makes sense. --Arch2all (talk) 09:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not done - no consensus for the proposal --DannyS712 (talk) 01:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)