Wikidata:Property proposal/K point
construction point edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Sports
| Description | the steepest point on a ski jumping hill |
|---|---|
| Represents | construction point (Q1349828) |
| Data type | Quantity |
| Domain | Q1349828 |
| Allowed values | from 5 m to 250 m |
| Allowed units | m |
| Example 1 | Tremplin du Praz (Q1739981) → 120 m |
| Example 2 | Große Olympiaschanze (Q669932) → 125 m |
| Example 3 | Vikersundbakken (Q1422121) → 195 m |
| Example 4 | Schattenberg Ski Jump (Q704787) → 90 m, 120 m |
| Example 5 | La Côte Feuillée (Q591692) → 106 m, 56 m, 28 m, 10 m, 8 m |
| Source | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_point |
| Planned use | every ski jumping hill has its own size; this important data has to be displayed by wikidata |
Motivation edit
This data is very important for ski jumping and nordic combined: the hill specifications make the difference. I plan to use this data in pages about competitions, but it will also be very useful for the pages about the jumping hills themselves. Trace (talk) 21:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Discussion edit
Support Germartin1 (talk) 07:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- To what extend is that concept particular to ski jumping? Do hills that aren't used for skying have one as well? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 22:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- No, ski jumping hills are built and have a specific design, with tracks along the in-run etc. They can only be used for ski jumping. Trace (talk) 09:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support as "construction point" the item that refers to it isn't capitalized so it's unlikely that it's a proper name that should be capitalized. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 09:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting point of view. And how about the HS property proposal, just above? What do you think about its caps? Trace (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Important, easy to find and there are reliable sources. --Shev123 (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
