Wikidata:Property proposal/Medusa NRHP ID

Medusa NRHP ID

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Place

   Done: Medusa NRHP ID (P8282) (Talk and documentation)

Description	numerical identifier for a Maryland structure or building listed in the National Register of Historic Places in the Medusa database
Represents	Medusa (Q91762116)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	geographic location (Q2221906)
Allowed values	\d+
Example 1	Cove Point Light (Q5178935) → 24973
Example 2	Riley-Bolten House (Q14692364) → 17889
Example 3	USS Torsk (Q7874823) → 46368
Source	https://mht.maryland.gov/secure/medusa/
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Planned use	Template:Buildings links (Q25751684)
Expected completeness	eventually complete (Q21873974)
Formatter URL	https://mht.maryland.gov/secure/medusa/mapintermediate.aspx?PropertyID=$1&selRec=nrhp
See also	NRHP reference number (P649), Maryland's National Register Properties ID (P8165)

Motivation

This new Wikidata property for authority control for cultural heritage (Q18618628) would help improve our coverage of the history of Maryland (Q5865454). Thierry Caro (talk) 18:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

WikiProject Cultural heritage has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead..

Thierry Caro Fuzheado

Notified participants of WikiProject United States. Thierry Caro (talk) 18:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Is that really usefull, since we have already Maryland's National Register Properties ID (P8165) and they have link to each other? --Fralambert (talk) 18:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • I would agree it's not the most needed thing on Earth. But the formatter URL and the IDs themselves are different from the ones of the other property. And the target pages have a different layout, etc. So it's still worth storing this too, in my opinion. Just for the sake of being as exhaustive as we can be. I don't mind adding both properties whenever I can, honestly. Thierry Caro (talk) 21:50, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. Useful. Ivanhercaz (Talk) 02:01, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Susanna Giaccai (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
• @Thierry Caro, Ivanhercaz, Giaccai:  Done --Fralambert (talk) 22:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)