Wikidata:Property proposal/National Transportation Safety Board report

National Transportation Safety Board report

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Transportation

   Done: National Transportation Safety Board report ID (P6995) (Talk and documentation)

Description	National Transportation Safety Board report
Represents	National Transportation Safety Board report (Q64852967)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	transport accident (Q11822042)
Allowed values	[A-Z]{3}\d{4}
Example 1	2015 Oklahoma State University homecoming parade crash (Q23303373) → HAB1608
Example 2	American Airlines Flight 383 (Q28100218) → AAR1801
Example 3	2016 Lockhart hot air balloon crash (Q26201735) → AAR1703
Example 4	FedEx Express Flight 14 (Q5439889) → AAR0002
Example 5	Delta Air Lines Flight 9570 (Q5254569) → AAR7303
Source	https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/AccidentReports.aspx
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/$1.pdf

Motivation

This property would allow linking items about accidents to the official reports about them. DannyS712 (talk) 04:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Support David (talk) 05:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support @DannyS712: I adjusted the examples and the formatter URL slightly. Do you know if this will work for all such reports? Mahir256 (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

  Yes, it would work, but for some reports, linking to ...Pages/ isn't as good as linking to the ...Reports/, since the "pages" only includes an executive summary and probably cause, and for some, like https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/pages/AAR7303.aspx, those are left blank. --DannyS712 (talk) 22:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

  • @DannyS712: Then could all the examples be changed to use "Reports" rather than "Pages", or use some other neutral URL scheme? Mahir256 (talk) 22:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
    •  Done --DannyS712 (talk) 23:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 16:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support. This system seems to have been in use for a very long time, and published reports are probably never retracted or changed, so the maintenance burden is low. Might be worth documenting how the is can have additional minuses (like the oldest report you provide has on its cover page) --Ysangkok (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support changed the proposal a bit, hope it's ok. Kristbaum (talk) 09:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done @Ysangkok, Vulphere, DannyS712, Mahir256, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: --Kristbaum (talk) 10:12, 11 July 2019 (UTC)