Wikidata:Property proposal/Opinion joined by
opinion joined by
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Description | Who joins a judicial opinion |
---|---|
Data type | Item |
Template parameter | en:template:Infobox SCOTUS case - JoinMajority, JoinConcurrence, JoinConcurrence/Dissent, JoinDissent |
Domain | instance of (P31) legal case (Q2334719) |
Example 1 | Roe v. Wade (Q300950)has part(s) (P527)majority opinion (Q6738447) <opinion joined by> Warren E. Burger (Q346685), William O. Douglas (Q1391996), etc. |
Example 2 | United States v. U.S. District Court (Q2791142)has part(s) (P527)majority opinion (Q6738447) <opinion joined by> William O. Douglas (Q1391996), Potter Stewart (Q1359993), etc. |
Example 3 | Obergefell v. Hodges (Q19866992)has part(s) (P527)dissenting opinion (Q1092720) (of Chief Justice Roberts) <opinion joined by> Antonin Scalia (Q11156), Clarence Thomas (Q11142) |
Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
Motivation
editCurrently, contributor to the creative work or subject (P767) is used, but joining an opinion does not necessitate contributing to writing it. DannyS712 (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Support David (talk) 07:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC).
- SupportStudiesWorld (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Nomen ad hoc, DannyS712, StudiesWorld: Done: opinion joined by (P7122). − Pintoch (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)