Wikidata:Property proposal/Plot continued in
plot continued in edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
| Description | a narrative in this creative work is continued in another work while not necessarily being part of the same series |
|---|---|
| Represents | sequel (Q261636) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | item |
| Example 1 | The Time Machine: An Invention (Q627333) → A Scientific Romance (Q23163)} Continues the plot of the time machine (the actual time traveling device), not its Pilot. Created ~100 years later. Obviously not be the same writer. |
| Example 2 | Who Mourns for Adonais? (Q3487403) → Pilgrim of Eternity (Q15131926) Continues the arc of the character Apollo. Created by fans. |
| Example 3 | The Hobbit (Q74287) → The Lord of the Rings (Q15228) Continues the arc of the one Ring and Bilbo. Same writer but not part of the same series. |
Motivation edit
The proposed property can be used to indicate that the referenced work continues an arc (of a character or thing) contained in the work. of course, we currently have follows (P155) & followed by (P156) but these are reserved for works that are in the same series of thing. (or are they?).--Shisma (talk) 19:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- I'm not completely sure about this, so
Weak support. --Giovanni Alfredo Garciliano Díaz ★ diskutujo 21:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC) 
Support David (talk) 08:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Comment we could also use has spin-off (P2512)--Shisma (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)- Comment I'm unsure about this. It could lead to well known works like Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (Q232009) having a gigantic list of marginally notable fan fiction attached to it. Do we need this vs based on (P144)? Or perhaps have the secondary work point back to to primary work with a property like "continues plot from?" -- Fuzheado (talk) 01:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support My first reaction was against this, but on reflection it has a distinct meaning of successor narrative but not part of the same series which is useful and not captured in any of the mentioned alternatives. has spin-off (P2512) and based on (P144) could point to works that have any kind of relation with the primary work, not just extending its plot. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Shisma, Giovanni Alfredo Garciliano Diaz, MartinPoulter: please make good use of it --- Jura 16:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
