Wikidata:Property proposal/Radio Courtoisie program ID
Radio Courtoisie program ID
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Withdrawn
Description | identifier for a program on Radio Courtoisie’s website |
---|---|
Represents | Radio Courtoisie (Q2209224) |
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | human (Q5) |
Example 1 | Le Monde de la philosophie (Q62843916) → libres-propos/le-monde-de-la-philosophie |
Example 2 | Langue française, joyau de notre patrimoine (Q62908530) → emissions-anciennes/langue-francaise-joyau-de-notre-patrimoine |
Example 3 | Parole et Pensée (Q62843482) → libres-propos/parole-et-pensee |
Number of IDs in source | 133 |
Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
Formatter URL | https://www.radiocourtoisie.fr/category/$1 |
92.184.102.144 20:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support David (talk) 06:58, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- David you know that Radio Courtoisie is a french far-right radio which hate arab people, isn'it? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Not the "radio" itself (which includes strictly non-political and cultural programs—see given examples), but it is true that some hosts are highly controversial. However there's no harm about it according to me, given that we already have properties for controversial websites such as Unz Review author ID (P2734) (see about this [1]). 92.184.112.78 10:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- David you know that Radio Courtoisie is a french far-right radio which hate arab people, isn'it? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Question How many "number of ids"? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- 133, if I didn't miscount. 92.184.112.78 09:55, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Question Why described at URL (P973) is not sufficent? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Because this property would provide us identifiers and enable us to enhance coverage of the topic. Furthermore, the given links don't really "describe" the programs. Hence described at URL (P973) wouldn't suit IMHO. 92.184.112.78 09:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The proposer already created several items using official website (P856) and I can't see any added benefit in creating a dedicated property, especially for so few items (and indeed there was no motivation provided initially) --Nono314 (talk) 12:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Visite fortuitement prolongée: are you supporting this property proposal. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)